Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent editions
  • News
  • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Contributors
    • Anabelle Bremner
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Dyonn Dimmock
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Julie Paterson
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Aldred
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Oliver Jobe
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Richard Kemp
    • Rob Parsons
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
  • Features
    • Features 2024
    • Features 2023
    • Features 2022
    • Features 2021
    • Features 2020
    • Features 2019
    • Features 2018
    • Features 2017
    • Features 2016
    • Features 2015
    • Features 2014
    • Features 2013
    • Features 2012
  • Arts
    • Arts
  • Local history
    • Local history
  • Environment
    • Environment
  • Nature notes
    • Nature notes
  • A cook's journal
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
    • Stories
  • About the Post

Here’s to you, Comrade

12/11/2025

7 Comments

 
Picture
Gough Whitlam on the steps of old Parliament House after the Labor Government had been sacked by the Governor General John Kerr, November 11, 1975. Photo: National Archives of Australia

​By Catherine Watson
 
"WHERE were you when you heard that John Kerr had sacked the Whitlam Government?"
 
Jan Bourne’s question to a gathering of the comrades of the Wonthaggi-Bass branch of the ALP on Tuesday night – marking half a century since the Dismissal – prompted a flood of memories.
 
Leslie Adams was 15 and in a history class when her teacher stormed in and said “Shut up everyone! History is happening right now. You all need to remember this.” At the time, she said, she was fairly oblivious. It was only four or five years later that she realised the import of what the teacher was saying.
Margaret Williamson was secretary of the Portland branch of the ALP, in Malcolm Fraser’s electorate, when she heard the Government had been sacked. A teacher friend came in with a bottle later that afternoon and said the American teachers at her school wanted to know when the revolution was going to start. “I remember it as a time of great apprehension and sadness,” Margaret said.
 
While there was some mourning to be done, this was principally an evening of celebration at the Whalebone Hotel. The customary raffle for party funds featured a two-volume biography of Whitlam by Jenny Hocking, portraits of Gough and Anthony Albanese and a 10-year-old bottle of wine purchased on the 40th anniversary of the Dismissal.
 
Gough’s campaign song “It’s Time!” by Little Pattie and a roll call of famous names opened the floodgates. Ed Thexton proudly sported one of the original IT’S TIME badges complete with rust. ​
 
Graeme Phipps, the branch vice president, gave a potted history of the man he called “the greatest politician in Australia’s history”, ending with the scene on the steps of Parliament in which the Governor General’s secretary announced that the Labor Government had been sacked, ending the proclamation with the customary words of the time “God save the Queen”.
 
In unison the whole room recounted Gough’s haughty, immortal response: “WELL MAY WE SAY GOD SAVE THE QUEEN BECAUSE NOTHING WILL SAVE THE GOVERNOR GENERAL!”
 
Leiticia Laing recited some of the great man’s greatest quotes. In response to an anti-abortion heckler at a rally during the 1972 election campaign, "Let me make quite clear that I am for abortion and, in your case sir, we should make it retrospective!"
 
Asked what he would do if he met God: “I shall treat him as an equal.” 
What’s Whitlam ever done for me?
​

In just three years, between 1972 and 1975, the Whitlam Government introduced an extraordinary 508 pieces of legislation. These were not trivial matters but the big ones: establishing Medibank, introducing Aboriginal land rights, ending conscription, banning racial and sexual discrimination, introducing free legal aid, free university education, , no-fault divorce, equal pay for women (loud laughter in the room!) and needs-based funding for schools (more laughter).
 
“It was like seeing or being involved in the tail end of a comet," Jan Bourne said. "It’s hard to explain how life changing it was.”

She offered her own experience: 
“Six years after the Dismissal, I was newly separated with two young children. I was able to get the single mother's pension, which meant I could work part time and support myself, I was then able to go to university and to work in the newly developed field of community development for virtually my whole career. All as a result of Whitlam government initiatives."

Mary Mutsaers had a similar story. She was married with two young children. “I was able to get a BA. I had no idea I’d ever be able to do anything like that. It was the best thing that ever happened to me.”

​According to Kevin Walsh, it wasn't just the material impact but the sudden opening up of Australia to new ways of thinking: “I had the benefit of a strong Catholic background full of guilt. All of a sudden there was the removal of censorship. It caused me to start questioning the restrictive practices of my faith, the Catholic church that had a dead hand on society.”

 
The evening ended with a video of Noel Pearson’s extraordinary eulogy of Gough – “this old man”, as he called him, with great affection and respect – at Whitlam's memorial service in 2014.
Picture

Pearson asked the question – how could a man like Whitlam, a middle-class white male who had never suffered racial discrimination, sexual discrimination or any kind of discrimination – how was it that he had the imagination to see the discrimination all around him and bring in a series of ground-breaking laws banning racial and sexual discrimination?
 
Pearson was mesmerising but occasionally the camera left him and flashed over the old prime ministers, to the delight of the comrades. Fraser – “BOO!” Tony Abbott – even louder “BOO!”
 
Pearson talked about the difference between being a managerial government, focused on re-election, and a government of reform. He ended by saying something like “Don’t lament that the Whitlam government only lasted three years. What more could they have achieved in a decade?”
 
It was an exhilarating performance, resonating 11 years later with the faithful at the Whalebone Hotel.
 
It also exposed the elephant in the room. What kind of Labor Government do we have under Anthony Albanese – a managerial government, focused on re-election, or a government of reform? The answer was plain.

7 Comments
Frank W Schooneveldt
13/11/2025 09:43:47 am

Today, 13th November 2025 Australia’s first treaty with Aboriginal people has been singed and formalised as law.
Gough Whitlam would be proud.



Reply
Sharon Hurley link
13/11/2025 05:44:54 pm

An excellent read. Gough, you will continue to be 'one of the greats' and an inspiration.

Reply
Pete Granger
13/11/2025 07:03:51 pm

Given the deep divide between the political left and right, the only viable path to power for any party is to occupy the political centre—especially when the opposition foolishly vacates it. This is precisely where the Liberal-National Coalition (LNP) now finds itself. As tedious as it may seem to some, Albanese understands this dynamic well. He recognises that the electorate holds both progressive and conservative values.

Gough governed in a very different era. He capitalised on decades of conservative fatigue by promising sweeping reforms—a form of catch-up politics. In contrast, Albanese has taken a more cautious approach, especially after the setback of the Voice referendum. He now borrows selectively from both the left and right, advancing change incrementally.

Pace and timing are critical. Move too fast, and he risks alienating the centre. Move too slow, and he risks appearing ineffective—creating an opening for the opposition. For now, the LNP has gifted him the centre, and Albanese shows no intention of squandering it.

Reply
Frank W Schooneveldt
14/11/2025 07:39:40 am

The Labor Party has been given a huge mandate by the Australian people to implement change.
Introduce 4 year terms of government, Restructure the Senate to recognise the population in each state.
Redistribute wealth in the country and introduce a universal basic income to reduce poverty.
This is just for starters.

Reply
Anne
14/11/2025 09:33:40 am

Gough Whitlam certainly shaped modern Australia. It sure was "Time"
My life would certainly have been a different one but for the reforms of his government.

Reply
Frank W Schooneveldt
17/11/2025 06:47:45 am

We are living in an Inequality Emergency. Australia should lead the world in addressing this issue by introducing progressive tax policies. By Introducing a Universal Basic Income.
The Government should forget about holding onto to power at all costs but rather introduce lasting reform.
We need to take Gough Whitlam’s Generosity of spirit and create change.
Leadership is taking people on a journey where that haven’t been before for the benefit of everyone.

Reply
Pete Granger
17/11/2025 08:59:42 am

It is best the lesson is not lost. Whitlam won the election, but well before his allotted time, also lost the electorate. In a landslide. In their time, both Menzies and Whitlam represented the political centre. However, as the electorate 'progressed' (no doubt much to do with immigration, the Vietnam war, international travel, the breaking of the nexus with Britain) Menzies and the conservatives appeared frozen in time. Conversely, Whitlam sensed 'the times were a changing', and bottled this sentiment. His forever-legacy is a more permanent Pavlovian shift of the electorate to a more progressive political centre. However, conservatives have had more than their fair share of administering this new norm, and this should be instructive.

Political change has to be incremental, except when politicians stray too far to the political left or the right, and a correction is overdue. Albanese is intent on preventing such a correction. The price to pay for his incumbency is reform which is too leisurely for many. Conversely, it keeps a demonstrably incompetent opposition out of power.

Arguably, he has overreached on two 'progressive' issues, 'the Voice', and 'family law reform'. He does not need to increase this tally. Controlling the centre, he has the Libs fighting for their very survival. An even more progressive agenda also invites the rise of the neo-Nazi's. That is, men largely disillusioned with feminist overreach.

The world will have its 'universal basic income' soon enough. Inevitably, AI will automate business and personal compliance, significantly reducing the need for 'intermediaries'. That is, gatekeepers, consultants, brokers, administrators and bureaucrats. This cohort do not produce tangible goods as such, but to deal with increasing complexity, manage, regulate, or profit from transactions. Their 'disenfranchisement' will force governments into a 'universal basic income'. Moreover, the taxing of algorithms, consumption and capital gains, as a partial substitute for income.

Reply



Leave a Reply.