Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent articles
  • News
    • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Contributors
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Julie Paterson
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Richard Kemp
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
  • Features
    • Features 2024
    • Features 2023
    • Features 2022
    • Features 2021
    • Features 2020
    • Features 2019
    • Features 2018
    • Features 2017
    • Features 2016
    • Features 2015
    • Features 2014
    • Features 2013
    • Features 2012
  • Arts
  • Local history
  • Environment
  • Nature notes
    • Nature notes
  • A cook's journal
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
    • Stories
  • Contact us

Leave our trees alone!

12/12/2024

4 Comments

 
Picture
"People come for the cheap housing and fall in love with the bush and wildlife." Residents speak up about plans by Hanson Construction Materials to widen their quiet country road for sand trucks.
By Jan Grimes

WE CAME to the Adams Estate in our 20s and I’m 71 now. There were a couple of washed out tracks going through the tea tree and the gums. I’ve always been a bush person and I love animals. I remember climbing a tree and telling my mother “This is where the house is going to go”.

We bought here, number one, because it was all we could afford. Because it was so rough it was very cheap. We paid $3500. Adams Estate was classed as an inappropriate subdivision. Lots had to be consolidated so they could take the sewerage. We had to buy four blocks and that gave us three-quarters of an acre.

We built the house ourselves. Bluestone and slate and all the hard stuff. We lived without electricity for many, many years. We’re still on our own water supply.
People move here for the cheap housing but they fall in love with the bush and the wildlife. When we were first here it was nothing to see a koala in our front yard. The lace monitors used to come down to our house, which is at the lower end of the estate. They’re still around. It’s such an incredible sanctuary for wildlife. I still see new birds almost every year.

Later we bought another bit of land going down the hill towards Stanley Road because we wanted to make sure that bush remained. At the time we were thinking maybe our kids could live there in the future and we could share resources.

There are three generations of us here now. My kids Ringo and Anita were born there. Now Ringo and his partner Ianthe have their two boys, Indra and Maki. They’re all bush kids.

In the 1990s the sand mines started expanding around Grantville. We all opposed the original application for the sand mine at the end of Stanley Road. How could they possibly think of going through a residential estate? Some of the residents went to VCAT over it. There were meetings, gatherings, letters back and forwards with the authorities. It went on for years. We all got burnt out by the battle.
Picture
Hanson Construction Materials, part of the giant multinational Heidelberg Materials, plans to widen Stanley Road for sand trucks to service two new quarries at the end of the road.
  The company has applied for a permit to remove 1.7 hectares of significant vegetation from Stanley Road, including 36 large trees.
  DEECA says the removal will degrade high-quality remnant areas of native vegetation and habitat for threatened species including Powerful Owls, Lace Monitors, Gang Gang Cockatoos, Strzelecki gums and critically endangered orchids.
  The full planning documents and objections are at Bass Coast Shire Council.
  The council had received 46 objections by Thursday. Submissions are open until February when councillors will decide whether the clearing can proceed.
Then it all went quiet. Decades went past. I started to think it was never going to happen. Now it’s started all over again. I went up the end of McGrady Road the other day and saw where they’ve started clearing. I hadn’t been there for years. Houses have just been bulldozed. There are endangered orchids there and all the animals.

​Every day when I drive up Stanley Road I look at the beautiful canopy of trees, I see the wallabies and kangaroos crossing, and the odd echidna and wombat.   I look at it and try to prepare myself for the devastation that’s going to be there when the trees are gone. What’s it going to be like? Like a graveyard, with everything gone.


It was a good turnout at the rally on Friday. I was happy that people turned up to show how they feel. That made me feel good to see that there are kindred spirits who care about the bush and the animals. There were people in their 40s who were born there, and their children.

Some people say you’ll never stop the sand mining companies. They’re too big. But we’ve got to try. We’ve got a chance of winning if we all stick together and we’ve got a lot of support.  We all love the bush and want to preserve it. We keep on keeping on!
Picture
4 Comments
Meryl Tobin link
13/12/2024 01:11:34 pm

A passionate appreciation and defence of your special part of the Western Port Woodlands, Jan! Congrats and thankyou. Thank you too to the Adams Estate people and others who rallied to protest against the proposed widening of Stanley Rd, a wildlife corridor and home to some of our dwindling flora and fauna.
As a kid I remember walking to school in Research and enjoying the masses of egg and bacon plants and other wildflowers along both sides of the road. I took it for granted all would last forever. Not so.
Here, along Stanley Rd, we have a precious remnant of the irreplaceable pre-European indigenous bush remaining between Lang Lang and Grantville. Only 5% of such bush remains in West Gippsland, and the Western Port Woodlands is the biggest stand of it. It took millions of years to evolve and is home to biodiversity necessary for a healthy planet to survive. Does it make sense to destroy it for short term monetary gain and for some concrete and sand that would be better sourced in far less sensitive areas or, better still, further develop sustainable industries, such as hemp, recycling concrete and plastics, to supply some of our needs?
What right have we got to ‘eat’ the heritage of future generations?

Reply
Robbie Viglietti
15/12/2024 06:45:25 pm

What utter hypocrisy.

Every resident of Adams Estate is guilty of occupying land that that has been cleared of native vegetation; there would be no Adams Estate without vegetation clearing. Don't take my work for it; refer to the attached photographs which are geolocated and time stamped.

You will see that the residents of Adams Estate are chopping down trees and carving up the "Woodlands" as late as today (15 December 2024) and yet they are using the "Save the trees" argument in a ludicrous attempt to stop the upgrade of the goat track known as Stanley Road; an upgrade that was sanctioned (actually, forced on Heidelberg Materials - then Pioneer - and Barro) by VCAT over 20 years ago.

Heidelberg Materials has submitted 4 redesigns for the upgrade of the road to minimize impact to the environment. The reality is that an unmade road that is not properly aligned and constructed with appropriate drainage to reduce run off and control dust poses a far greater environmental threat than leaving the track in its existing condition.

The loss of a few trees (that will be replaced by offsets anyway) is inconsequential compared to the broader environmental issues of not fixing this road.

The howls of outrage to the proposed upgrade led me to read every one of the 45 objections lodged with the Bass Coast Shire Council regarding this application.

All but one objection directly cites the loss of vegetation as their primary issue in opposing the upgrade of Stanley Road.

However, on closer examination, it becomes apparent that every objection is basically a "cut and paste" from the "Save the Woodlands" manifesto drafted by the Woodlands Messiah/environmental songwriter and now Bass Coast Shire Council, Tim O'Brien.

In fact, one of the letters of objection actually starts out referencing "Tim"!!!

Given Tim O'Brien and the other "Green" Councillors (Mat Morgan, Tracey Bell and John Temby) have a stated bias to stop all sand mining (sic) quarrying in the Bass Coast Shire, I trust that based on the Local Government code of conduct rule "Ensuring unbiased democratic decision making - April 2013" (see Vic Gov website) that they will all abstain from voting on this Planning Permit Application.

I look forward to the next 4 years of holding the Green Councillors to account.

Reply
Robbie Viglietti
15/12/2024 06:47:23 pm

What utter hypocrisy.

Every resident of Adams Estate is guilty of occupying land that that has been cleared of native vegetation; there would be no Adams Estate without vegetation clearing. Don't take my work for it; refer to the attached photographs which are geolocated and time stamped.

You will see that the residents of Adams Estate are chopping down trees and carving up the "Woodlands" as late as today (15 December 2024) and yet they are using the "Save the trees" argument in a ludicrous attempt to stop the upgrade of the goat track known as Stanley Road; an upgrade that was sanctioned (actually, forced on Heidelberg Materials - then Pioneer - and Barro) by VCAT over 20 years ago.

Heidelberg Materials has submitted 4 redesigns for the upgrade of the road to minimize impact to the environment. The reality is that an unmade road that is not properly aligned and constructed with appropriate drainage to reduce run off and control dust poses a far greater environmental threat than leaving the track in its existing condition.

The loss of a few trees (that will be replaced by offsets anyway) is inconsequential compared to the broader environmental issues of not fixing this road.

The howls of outrage to the proposed upgrade led me to read every one of the 45 objections lodged with the Bass Coast Shire Council regarding this application.

All but one objection directly cites the loss of vegetation as their primary issue in opposing the upgrade of Stanley Road.

However, on closer examination, it becomes apparent that every objection is basically a "cut and paste" from the "Save the Woodlands" manifesto drafted by the Woodlands Messiah/environmental songwriter and now Bass Coast Shire Councillor, Tim O'Brien.

In fact, some of the letters of objection start out referencing "Tim"!!!

Given Tim O'Brien and the other "Green" Councillors (Mat Morgan, Tracey Bell and John Temby) have a stated bias to stop all sand mining (sic) quarrying in the Bass Coast Shire, I trust that based on the Local Government code of conduct rule "Ensuring unbiased democratic decision making - April 2013" (see Vic Gov website) that they will all abstain from voting on this Planning Permit Application.

I look forward to the next 4 years of holding the Green Councillors to account.













Reply
Neil Rankine
16/12/2024 06:40:51 pm

Mr Vigliette who own a number of sand mines in Bass Coast insults local residents, this proposal is about environmental damage done outside the estate and they are responding to that!
His argument that the environment benefits from a made road are spurious. There is the argument that silt running into waterways is an issue but a made surface creates higher volumes but importantly higher velocity of flow, which does it's damage further into the fragile environment, scouring, silting, etc. Further, if, as is the case with some of this, the water is captured by drainage and diverted to the bay, pollutants have an impact but also importantly, the fragile environment of the woodlands is deprived of that life giving water. Most residents are arguing the mine should not proceed at any rate, so the road clearly means a complete removal of some of the environment, edge impacts, etc, on the remaining environment if the mine does go ahead.
I've read the objections too and they are surprisingly all quite different, occasionally using some of the Woodlands info, but certainly not just 'cut and paste'. How can Mr Viglietti be sure, ‘Tim’, if it’s there, I didn’t note it, refers to Tim O'Brien?
At any rate, all councillors are expected to have views on issues, those views are often the reason people vote for them. Once on council, they are expected to pursue policy changes that might support what people desire, that's democracy. However, when it comes to making planning decisions, they are obliged to consider all the facts around the application before making a decision. They have a wealth of info in the on-line documents and now further info to digest from Mr Viglietti, if he puts in a submission! A councillor has the officer resources also to put views like these from Mr Viglietti, to, and seek clarification or knowledge before making their final decision. The obligation of a councillor is to weigh up all the info presented and make a decision in the best interests of their community! A conflict of interest is when the councillor has a direct benefit from voting a certain way, usually financial or in some other tangible way. A declaration is required and abstaining from voting is required in this situation. I would expect that a councillor would not say that they would never vote in such and such a way on an upcoming decision until all available information is before them. General comments about always supporting, for example, environmental best practice, are just reinforcing that the councillor is there representing the people who voted for them. A councillor may have made some strong statements as a civilian before becoming a councillor, but they know they are required to look at the whole picture once in the role. Green leaning councillors are, in my view, often the best at doing that, they see how environment and community lose when the whole picture isn't considered.
Robbie can now, no longer claim that the locals overwhelmingly support the mines!

Reply



Leave a Reply.