Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent editions
  • News
  • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Contributors
    • Anabelle Bremner
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Dyonn Dimmock
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Julie Paterson
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Aldred
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Oliver Jobe
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Richard Kemp
    • Rob Parsons
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
  • Features
    • Features 2024
    • Features 2023
    • Features 2022
    • Features 2021
    • Features 2020
    • Features 2019
    • Features 2018
    • Features 2017
    • Features 2016
    • Features 2015
    • Features 2014
    • Features 2013
    • Features 2012
  • Arts
    • Arts
  • Local history
    • Local history
  • Environment
    • Environment
  • Nature notes
    • Nature notes
  • A cook's journal
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
    • Stories
  • About the Post

​So, where to start?

16/9/2025

3 Comments

 
Picture
By Matt Stone

RECENTLY I’ve been paying more attention to how people express themselves than I have previously. Whilst I am generally interested in what people say, as there are many fascinating/interesting topics people can and do talk about, the fact that there are nearly as many “conversationalists” that are dead-set boring may have affected my attitude[1]. As they say, it’s in the eye of the beholder!

So, what I have noticed is the use of the word “so”, which I had not paid much attention to in the past. So, I wondered whether it is the new “like”, the grammatical use of which, like, I cannot quite fathom.

So I did a little research and found “so” was an old and valued friend. By all accounts it goes back to the 14th century, appearing in some of Chaucer’s works, where it served several uses – an adverb, adjective and a conjunction (of which there are three types, where “so” is typically a co-ordinating conjunction).   I admit having to Google the meaning of conjunction. So, “so” derived from the word “swa” in the old English language, meaning “in this way’ or “in such a manner that”.

More recently, it’s used to head a group of words at the beginning of a sentence, as doubtless you have already noticed, that provides introductory information or sets the context as an introductory particle, where it can substitute for words such as consequently and therefore. Is it any wonder how difficult learning English as a second language is, especially for adult migrants! Liane and I both did a TEFL (Teaching English as a Foreign language) course and some of these terms still bemuse me, like.

So is also often used as a gentle query – “so?” or a less polite putdown – “so what!”.

Having bored you with an English lesson, I think my main observation is the frequent use of "so" to begin sentences, which I believe is a more recent phenomenon. Some scholars and academics believe there is evidence of it being a natural language evolution – which absolutely sinks my “like” theory! Like, who decides these things? 

It has been suggested that “so” is often used to begin a sentence because it helps the speaker to avoid giving a straight answer. So, has “so” become a crutch word which enables the speaker to pause, which can be very useful when they are (possibly) formulating a lie? I think this is highly unlikely as I have not heard a certain president use it once!

So, my new theory is it replaces the use of ahh and umm for speakers who are not very confident.

So, have you noticed it, and if so, have I raised your awareness to it?  If you are someone who loves to delve further, try reading A Brief History of the Word “So” by Heather N King.

Hopefully, like, I haven’t created a visual earworm. So long!
3 Comments
John Mutsaers link
19/9/2025 10:54:31 am

So, Good, Matt.

Reply
Anne Heath Mennell
25/9/2025 03:36:05 pm

Hi Matt, I first encountered 'So' in the mid-nineties. A young academic who had studied in the States used it frequently. My understanding was that public speakers were encouraged to use it to avoid using 'Er' or 'um' to cover a pause for thought before answering a question. It still sounds awkward to me but not as irritating as 'like'!

Reply
Lee Tierney
2/10/2025 09:09:21 pm

Bravo Matt for your 'SO' piece. There seems no debate as to this word's diverse and legitimately useful applications in our language..Fascinating. Unfortunately the same cannot be said for the current mindless and persistent ongoing use of the 'Like' word. Oh dear...How can I try to take such speakers seriously? I clearly recall in 1964 NSW Primary School, when Formal Gramar English had its last year in the education syllabus there, that 'Like' was underscored with the warning that it be employed "sparingly" and not in place of using "as though", for instance. We concede that English is a living breathing language, open to its own changing evolution but this current craze in the vernacular for 'like' is persistently mindless when inserted multiple times within a single sentence. Also I had no idea that younger folk too often were not aware of the difference between an adjective and an adverb. It is after all widespread when asked how someone is, ('going' understood, being a Verb) so it requires a choice of adverbs to describe it, such as 'well' or 'poorly' or 'very well' but it is widespread in Australia to hear the reply "Good". My retort to the junior office colleagues was always that I already knew them to be a "good person". The good natured speakers did concede in due course that Excellence was not a bad quality to aspire to. I'm not sure if it has become an Australia wide phenomena to pronounce the fifth letter of the alphabet (E) as an 'A' as in the word 'Apple'? Perhaps it's just a Vic characteristic that leads to hearing tv spokespeople on certain news channels to pronounce 'Melbourne' as 'MALbourne'? It may be a result of the increasing exposure to the American accent so widely watched on tv, for lengthier viewing hours than my baby boomer generation ever indulged in.. I can only speculate. My last curious observation of late was on hearing this year from some Vic teachers reporting in the news re the "breakthrough" of "using a wonderful new system called 'Phonics" in teaching young children how to read. This was the only system employed in my NSW kindergarten to gain the wherewithall to pronounce a letter, which led to the confidence to read fluently. So, the' wheel' turns, as it continues to be reinvented. Without Phonics I can imagine that my generation would undoubtedly have floundered learning to read confidently and efficiently. I'm glad that at least this system has been reinvented, if it means raising the existing literacy levels.

Reply



Leave a Reply.