Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent articles
  • Federal Election 2025
  • News
    • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Writers
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Julie Paterson
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Richard Kemp
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
  • Features
    • Features 2024
    • Features 2023
    • Features 2022
    • Features 2021
    • Features 2020
    • Features 2019
    • Features 2018
    • Features 2017
    • Features 2016
    • Features 2015
    • Features 2014
    • Features 2013
    • Features 2012
  • Arts
  • Local history
  • Environment
  • Nature notes
    • Nature notes
  • A cook's journal
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
    • Stories
  • Contact us

The laggard

17/4/2024

4 Comments

 
PictureOn February 8 1983, millions of tonnes of topsoil from cleared land in western Victoria and South Australia was deposited on Melbourne. Photo: Victorian Resources Online
By Ed Thexton

IN 1983, I quit work and took a year to learn more about ecology at Roseworthy Agricultural College in South Australia, then celebrating its centenary year.  Natural resources management rather than agricultural production was my preferred study, and my thesis was about trees on farms.

Remember 1983?  The defining moment of the drought was the dust storm that blacked out Melbourne, followed on February 16 by the Ash Wednesday bushfires that swept from Adelaide through Victoria. 

​On February 17 I drove to South Australia.  It was still hot, and I cooked the motor of my tiny Mazda 1000 ute at Talem Bend and hitch hiked through the ravaged Adelaide hills to begin my studies. 

​For a farm boy from the high rainfall Yarra Valley, the flat windswept wheat and sheep farms, in the driest, most cleared state in the world’s driest continent, were a shock.
​

In the context of indigenous vegetation on private land in Australia, 1983 was pivotal.  Since settlement, all federal and state governments had encouraged vegetation clearing. To the grazier grass is king.  When Europeans arrived in this large flat continent, they continued the unspoken pact with the cow and sheep: if it shades my grass, I’ll cut it down; if it eats my grass, I’ll shoot it.   

South Australia was the first state to reverse the established order.  On May 12 1983, overnight, with no compensation, South Australia enacted planning controls.  “As of right” clearing by farmers was replaced by a government-sanctioned permit system. 

As a gauge of how extreme the situation was, not even the state's peak farming body questioned the need for the controls.  Some agricultural areas had well under 10 per cent indigenous vegetation left.
Victoria followed South Australia in introducing controls in 1989, yet the clearing continues to this day. As of 2022, Victoria is two thirds privately owned, 79% of which is cleared.  In 2022 a Victorian Auditor General’s Office (VAGO) report on native vegetation loss on private land estimated that 10,000 hectares is lost across Victoria each year. 

The VAGO report concluded: “Councils are not adequately managing native vegetation clearing on private land and have not taken effective action against unauthorised clearing.”
Having subdued the vegetation masterfully we are reaping the reward: extinction, first local, then general.  How does it happen?  One animal, one plant at a time.

At Roseworthy I was introduced to the bell curve of adoption.  It’s a simple line graph that shows the rate over time of adoption of new products or ideas.  
Picture
​“As banks all over the world start cutting off lending to coal miners, Jefferies Group stands out as a clear climate laggard, apparently willing to be the lender of last resort for these polluting companies.”                                                     Market Forces, March 23, 2024
The bell reflects the inertia of business as usual. It means that for every farmer who started fencing and weed control 40 years ago to retain native vegetation, six of his neighbours could continue to this very day to let loose with excavator, tractor or cow to rip, bust, tear or chew at the vegetation remnants, because that’s what Dad did.

The indigenous vegetation retention of Bass Coast Shire today is similar to the retention rates of the agricultural areas of South Australia in 1983, with just 2 to 14% left (depending on the source), most of it modified and fragmented. The few gems that have inadvertently survived, such as the Western Port Woodlands, are on the brink of destruction if sand mining continues as it has done. Meanwhile, in Corinella, decades of rehabilitation work along the foreshore is at risk, with apparent support from Victoria’s own Environment Department.

Two things give me hope. Last year I heard Bass Coast’s environmentalist of the year, Paul Spiers, say he had seen a massive increase in the amount and quality of native vegetation in our shire over the past three decades. You only have to look at the Bass Hills to see the truth of Paul’s statement. Those previously bald hills – cleared for farming early in European settlement – are now starting to look like a patchwork quilt with the dark green signifying mass plantings in the gullies.
Picture
Revegetation in the Bass Hills. Photo: Bass Coast Landcare Network
Picture
Which brings me to my second point. Did you know that the Bass Coast Landcare Network is the second biggest Landcare organisation in Australia, second only to Noosa? It works closely with our council, which in 2018 adopted a Biodiversity Biolinks Plan. In the first four years, more than 2.5 million indigenous plants were planted in 200 locations across the shire, resulting in around 1100ha of revegetation.

​1100 hectares represents 1.27% of Bass Coast’s total land area of 86,600 hectares. When we have so little left, it's a significant gain. But it’s not a net gain. Always, landscape wide, the incremental, unwavering removal continues. On any given week one sees a farm fence replaced, a road reconstructed, a pest plant poorly sprayed. 

​It is not that each individual action is not justifiable and even reasonable when taken in isolation.  Systemic degradation is the cumulative effect of each of those isolated actions, delivered over decades.  One plant at a time.
​
Picture
What can be destroyed in an afternoon on an excavator can take decades to rectify, if ever.
In the 40 years after I went to Roseworthy, rehabilitation of rural waterways became my speciality.  Waterway rehabilitation has been a grand experiment, confirming the maxim that it is easier to wreck than rebuild.  What can be destroyed in an afternoon on an excavator can take decades to rectify, if ever.

Should the laggard be demonised?  Demonisation is such a convenient get out.  It is similar to the great “they”, as in the “they … should, should’ve, could’ve” school.  They are everybody else but you.  The blame game is the preserve of the lazy.  Extinction is our issue.

Who can blame farmers for preferring the clarity of maximising profit over the minefield of conservation?  If we are serious about retention, then the State should support them to change their practices by recognising and compensating their sacrifice for the public good.

Ed Thexton is president of the South Gippsland Conservation Society.
4 Comments
Bernie McComb
19/4/2024 10:21:42 am

Let’s not forget that 70 to 80% of everything extracted from land, in Australia, is for export and benefit of big business. It’s still cute to think of brave Mom and Pop battler farmers but how many are left? Did read somewhere that most land clearing is done just before sale, to make it look green and fertile. Also read remark that when city folk get far enough out to see vast green paddocks, which they consider to be “the bush”, they’re actually seeing ecological vandalism.

Reply
Meryl Tobin link
19/4/2024 06:18:44 pm

Your article, as are the others you have contributed, is spot on, Ed. Thanks for sharing your experiences and knowledge.

Reply
Neil Rankine
21/4/2024 07:56:35 pm

Well said and explained Ed,
You are right that we should hesitate to 'blame' the farmers, businesses, etc that make decisions not always on the basis of preserving our life support system.We 'need', however, to be ever vigilant and more vocal than we have lately, toward those who set the rules under which our life support systems are being dismantled.

Reply
Anne Heath Mennell
6/5/2024 03:47:15 pm

Thank you, Ed for your informative and balanced words. Like Neil D fighting to protect the Western Port catchment and Catherine, Tim, Neil R and all the other Woodland Warriors trying to preserve the Proving Ground and Woodlands, we all need to be vigilant and vocal and persistent in holding decision makers to account.

Re Catherine's article on Nirvana Park, here are 5 acres with established trees, in need of some urgent TLC. Can we find the Park some Friends?

Reply



Leave a Reply.