Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent articles
  • News
    • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Writers
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Jordan Crugnale
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Phil Wright
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
    • Zoe Geyer
  • Features
  • Arts
  • Local history
  • Environment
  • Bass Coast Prize
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
  • Contact us

Hello Spring Street, are you listening?

10/12/2020

10 Comments

 
PictureWithout a long-term management plan, Western Port will continue to be a battleground for industrialists and residents
By Neil Daly
 
THE 75 likes for my article Thank you, AGL indicates there is interest in the proposal for a Western Port Strategic Management Plan (WPSMP).
 
Over time, I have put this proposition to the pub test; I can assure you the "real world people" say yes. 
 
They reason, in many cases, there are too many levels of government, statutory authorities and others all jockeying to manage Western Port, not to mention the endless sums of money spent on feasibility studies and academic research projects.

If there was an actual WPSMP underwritten by the State Government, we probably wouldn’t need a very expensive and time-consuming AGL / APA inquiry, for AGL, along with any other proponents wanting to develop Western Port’s infrastructure, would know exactly what they could or couldn’t do.
 
The same principle would apply to those charged with managing Western Port, for they too would be governed by the plan.
 
At the moment, however, every time a major proposal is put forward, in all likelihood, a “flotilla of kayaks” will put to sea to defend the sanctity of Western Port and its precious hinterland. 
 
This is not a good situation and the fight is set to continue.
 
For as expressed in a response to my AGL article, “The citizens of Crib Point and Hastings will stand firm in this fight AGAINST AGL and their horrendous pipeline project.  If worse comes to worse we will chain ourselves to the fence line to prevent any destruction of our beautiful foreshore ecosystem.”
 
So what is at stake? 
 
It’s your chance to present a plan that will appeal to the hearts and minds of Western Port’s traditional owners, and to those who live and work in this region and the many that come here to enjoy recreational pastimes and the country lifestyle.  
 
Western Port and its surrounds is a unique environment.  This is what the people like; this is what you must protect. 
******
By now you’ve probably dismissed my emotive plea, so it’s time I presented some evidence to support my call for a WPSMP.
 
Firstly I’d like to introduce the document “Understanding the Western Port Environment – A summary of current knowledge and priorities for future research”, November 2011. 
 
The publication presents analysis and recommendations by credible subject experts.  The executive summary sets the scene:    
 
'Western Port is special'
 
“Western Port is a unique feature on the Victorian coast, a large, semi-enclosed embayment on an exposed coastline, formed by complex geological processes (Figure 1).  Superficially similar to Port Phillip Bay, it is more complex than its western neighbour, with a greater tidal range, extensive intertidal mudflats, and two large islands (Phillip Island and French Island).  The tidal flats are cut by deep channels, with several catchments draining (some artificially connected) into the north eastern and eastern parts of the bay.  All of this makes for complex oceanographic circulation.  Much of its coastline is fringed by mangroves and saltmarshes, and there are extensive seagrass meadows on mudflats and below the low tide level.”
 
It goes on to say, and this is probably the crux of the matter:
 
 “Western Port has a wide range of values to Victorians, and much of its seabed and coastal area – including these environmental assets – are subject to multiple uses, many of which can threaten other environmental uses and underlying ecological processes.  The key is balancing these different values and uses and principles of Ecologically Sustainable Development.  With a long term strategic policy and management emphasis relating to Western Port’s environmental assets, social and economic considerations also need to be incorporated into the development of any future policy, strategies and plans for Western Port.”
 
This statement encapsulates my contention and suggests there is a need to bring together the current collection of individual plans to form a new, all-encompassing WPSMP. 
 
The situation, as it stands
 
Under the umbrella of Victoria’s Marine and Coastal Act 2018, we have:
  • Marine and Coastal Policy, 2020.
  • Victoria’s Marine and Coastal Reforms – Final Transition Plan, 2017.
  • Western Port Ramsar Site Management Plan, 2017.
 
In times gone by, we could probably keep muddling along with a collection of reports and plans administered by various government agencies, but the driver now is climate change. If we are to manage this situation, we need to develop a business plan – a holistic plan that takes into account the environmental values and the social and economic needs of this region.
 
There is a model for this approach: the Port Phillip Environmental Management Plan 2017-2027.
 
If you substitute ‘Western Port’ for ‘Port Phillip Bay’ in the “Goals of the Environmental Management Plan” statement, it goes on to say “…   offers a vast array of social, economic and environmental values to visitors and those who live and work around the Bay and its surrounding catchment.
 
The EMP's vision of 'a healthy Port Phillip Bay that is valued and cared for by all Victorians', and the following three main goals will guide future action and investment over the next 10 years:
  • Stewardship of the Bay is fostered across community, industry and government.
  • Water quality is improved to ensure environmental health and community enjoyment of the Bay.
  • The Bay's habitats and marine life are thriving.”
Two important elements
 
In your deliberations on this matter, two key elements need to be considered. These are found in the Marine and Coastal Policy, 2020:   

1.  The environment model and its message of the impacts of climate change.  In looking at it, one could consider it as a snapshot of Western Port and its environs.
Picture
2.  The fundamental change to how the sea and land in Western Port (and all coastal environments) will be treated under the Marine and Coastal Act 2018. 
Picture
“The Policy applies to the planning and management of matters relating to and affecting the marine and coastal environment.  As defined in the Marine and Coastal Act 2018, the marine and coastal environment includes all private and public land and waters between the outer limit of Victorian coastal water and five kilometres inland of the high-water mark of the sea, including:

  1. The land (whether or not covered by water) to a depth of 200 metres below the surface of that land.
  2. Any water covering the land referred to in paragraph (1) above from time to time.
  3. The biodiversity associated with the land and water referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2).

All policy directions apply to the above defined area unless otherwise indicated.
​
Where a particular policy references marine and coastal Crown land, the policy applies to that area only (see the Definitions section of the Policy).” 
 
These elements need to be considered as a whole and are fundamental to any future plans for Western Port and its Ramsar wetland.
 
Whatever the outcome of your thoughts, the time has come to treat Western Port and its Ramsar wetland not as separate entities, each with a separate plan, but as one environmental unit.  
 
Where to from here?
There are many definitions of strategic planning, but the following is a starting point.
 
The “Balanced Scorecard Institute” states: 
“Strategic planning is an organizational management activity that is used to set priorities, focus energy and resources, strengthen operations, ensure that employees and other stakeholders are working toward common goals, establish agreement around intended outcomes/results, and assess and adjust the organization’s direction in response to a changing environment.  It is a disciplined effort that produces fundamental decisions and actions that shape and guide what an organization is, who it serves, what it does, and why it does it, with a focus on the future.  Effective strategic planning articulates not only where an organization is going and the actions needed to make progress, but also how it will know if it is successful.”
 
While it could be said the model is only applicable to a business, I think we have reached a point where Western Port needs a business plan.  For those aspiring to lead us into the future, they need to look to this approach, for now is the time to act.
*****
It is a challenge, but I hope Spring Street can meet the challenge and present a WPSMP with clearly defined goals and measureable outcomes.  We need a plan, managed by one agency answerable to the Government.  
10 Comments
Lauren
11/12/2020 11:40:22 am

Great idea to have a Western Port Strategic Management Plan (WPSMP). Thus would also provide guidance for sand mining activities for the forest corridor within 5km of Western Port.

Reply
Clare Le Serve
11/12/2020 05:00:06 pm

Well done Neil, bring this to the Council Plan. We need street thinkers that have vision.

Reply
Kevin Chambers
11/12/2020 05:10:56 pm

Greetings Neil and other Western Port Lovers I have known and had the privilege to work with.

SIIIIIGHHHHH Your article is as true as ever, when probably someone like you and so many others opposed the BHP Esso Develpment 50 years ago in the 70's

Its over two years since I moved back to Melbourne, so right now I cant find the additional 2 or3 Western Port environmental studies you did not induce in your article. Suffice to say if I could find 'em they would say the same things the same things yours did.

In Short. "FOR GAWD'S SAKE DON'T TOUCH WESTERN PORT!!

But the money grubbers cant help 'emselves, so time and again the good people around Westrnm Port that care for and love it the way they do have to yet again, as you have stated, start" paddling the kayaks" again.

Its a sheer waste of taxpayers money and the time so many Western Port loving volunteers and groups.have to spend defending it, when at least in my case, when I lived down there , I should have been out on the bay trying to catch the elusive trophy size snapper.
.
So best of luck with AGL and the grass trees, sadly I think you are gunna need it.

Kev Chambers

Reply
Tony
11/12/2020 05:17:52 pm

In my experience, Neil’s long term objective approach can find a way through the system and produce an acceptable outcome for all interested parties.
Western Port must be protected from all those interests who seek to exploit and devalue and/or destroy what remains of a unique ecosystem that has survived colonisation and industrialisation relatively intact.
WPSMP is the best vehicle I have seen so far to protect and share a region and community in harmony with with its environment and responsibilities.
Please support Neil and others to achieve the outcome we all so desperately need.

Reply
Joy Button
12/12/2020 02:13:28 am

Congratulations Neil and what a really informative article. You know I love your thinking and your logic and the way that you can put it down on paper. Well done and thank you for your passion regarding the environment in which we all live.

Reply
Geoff Ellis
12/12/2020 07:28:30 am

Keep at it Neil.

Another great article from a tireless environmental champion.

We need to get behind the WPSMP so our shouts can be amplified and our message finally gets through to the decision makers at all levels of government AND industry.

HANDS OFF WESTERN PORT

I urge the customers and shareholders of AGL to use their leverage to help get that message through to the people who crafted this illogical gas supply chain.

Reply
Lorrie Read
12/12/2020 01:19:45 pm

What a good idea, a plan to protect our precious Western Port Bay. Putting the same arguments to all the development proposals over and over again is soul destroying and a waste of time. Please, listen State Government and protect our bay.

Reply
george varigos
12/12/2020 04:58:42 pm

Well done Neil a fantastic in article and analysis, with the evidence and logical background for all to understand including the Politicians and those with any Bias such as monetary interests to reflect on our wonderful region. There are alternatives not Western Port.
Yes the unique ecosystem is surely heritage and we should fight for that.
Your not just a street thinker you show you are a community expert, unbiased consultant on the matter and should have the hearing of councils in the region.
Take care and keep it up for our future generations .

Reply
Save westernport link
12/12/2020 07:11:54 pm

Wonderful article Neil!
In 2021, the Westernport Peninsula Protection Council will celebrate 50 years of working to protect Westernport’s precious marine and coastal ecosystems from the degradation and exploitation of unwanted and inappropriate industry and development.

So much has changed since the group formed in 1971,.
Recognition of the value of the non-built environment, and the commitment of people who care about places like Westernport has grown enormously, and it continues to grow.

But the urgency of biodiversity protection and awareness of good management practices needs the urgent support and meaningful leadership of govt decisions.

Incredibly, in 2019 Minister Wynne announced that the Bass Coast will be protected from poor planning decisions for the next 50 years by a Distinctive Areas and Landscape DAL listing.

We need to ask why Mr Wynne is still considering AGL’s hugely destructive and widely rejected plans to import and process gas in Westernport Bay?
The Bass Coast’s location on the shores of Westernport should afford this beautiful Bay the same 50 year planning protections as the Bass Coast itself.
The Draft Vision for the Bass Coast DAL lists many important locations within Westernport that all deserve protection under their international Ramsar listing.
https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/hdp.au.prod.app.vic-engage.files/6415/8336/4945/Bass_Coast_Vision_One_Pager.pdf

For more documents and information on the DAL scroll down here
EngageVic https://engage.vic.gov.au/distinctive-areas-and-landscapes-program/bass-coast

Please Write to Minister Wynne
richard.wynne@parliament.vic.gov.au

Or Call him and demand Westernport’s urgent protection
(03) 8683 0964

Visit Savewesternport.org

Reply
Vanessa Shipway
28/2/2021 08:55:53 pm

Thank you tirelessly bringing important environmental issues to the residents of the area. Another well written and informative article.

Reply



Leave a Reply.