Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent articles
  • News
    • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Writers
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Jordan Crugnale
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Phil Wright
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
    • Zoe Geyer
  • Features
    • Features 2022
  • Arts
  • Local history
  • Environment
  • Bass Coast Prize
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
  • Contact us

Sifting the plans in play

7/10/2021

6 Comments

 
PictureIt’s time for a new strategic framework for Western Port and its region, writes Neil Daly.
By Neil Daly

LOOKING back at the article 
For the next milestone, it seems the Government, despite three questions from Clifford Hayes about how to deal with Western Port’s environmental future, has not budged from its original answer. On the other hand, the Opposition, via the Member for Brighton, has moved forward and is now looking to discuss the matter.

In this moment of reflection, for it was January this year when I first contacted a number of MPs about the need for a strategic management plan for Western Port and its region, there were times when it seemed like a hopeless task.

But thanks to the tenacity of the Bass Coast Post readers and to the community stakeholder discussions chaired by the Victorian National Parks Association, the matter has not gone away and I would suggest we have reached the next milestone: a renewed commitment to protect Western Port.
​
However, the next milestone may take some time to reach.  For as Barbara Oates commented on my article Question time, with so many plans and strategies in existence, it is imperative we do not lose sight of the renewed commitment.
I agree with Barbara, for given the plans mentioned in ‘Question time’ and those now listed, it’s difficult to centre on what’s required to deal with the climate change issues confronting Western Port and, at the same time, devise an environmentally sustainable economic future for the region.
"We humans don't have the luxury of time.  Many opportunities have been lost to procrastination and political point scoring. "     
​                        Meg                  
In an effort to focus on some key issues, I published a model known as the Western Port Strategic Management Plan – Starter Kit.  It suggests that a regional approach should be adopted, and based on its goals, objectives and implementation strategy, use it to bring together the key elements from the various plans now tabled.
​
For example, the “project deliverables” from the South East Councils Climate Change Alliance, Strategic Plan (SECCCA) could be incorporated into my model, for as SECCCA states, “Our vision is for communities of the south east of Melbourne to be thriving, living a zero emissions lifestyle, and resilient to the changing climate.” 
​
This alliance includes the four councils bordering Western Port: Mornington Peninsula Shire; City of Casey; Cardinia Shire Council; and Bass Coast Shire Council.  In my model, they would constitute the Western Port Region.  

Following on from the SECCCA proposal, there is another plan that needs to be considered in relation to Western Port and its region: The Southern Metro Land Use Framework Plan.  Its principles and strategies apply to three of the councils named.  Unfortunately, it does not include Bass Coast.
​
The framework abruptly stops at the border between Bass Coast Shire and Cardinia Shire and this seems short-sighted, for climate change, land and water use, population pressures and infrastructure needs don’t stop at this border.

The reluctance to continue the holistic approach as sponsored by the framework is, I think, worth challenging as agricultural production, tourism and commerce, wildlife corridors, remnant woodlands, and carbon sequestration activities on the land and in Western Port itself transcend bureaucratic boundaries.  The waters of Western Port lap at all their foreshores and represent the lifeblood of this ecological, interconnected regional community.
 
The other plans named will also have to be considered, and somewhere in this mix, somebody will have to figure out what to do with Victoria’s share of the Morrison Government’s $100 million investment.  It is earmarked “to continue leading the world and our region in how we manage our ocean habitats and coastal environments and contribute to the global task of reducing emissions.”

So, the challenge is before us to look to Western Port’s future, and most importantly in the run up to the next Victorian state election, extract from our politicians how they are going to assess the plans before them and come up with a strategic management plan for Western Port and its region.

I’ve referred to the tenacity of the Bass Coast Post readers, so I’ll leave the last word to Meg.  I think she sums up the situation and, in a sense, speaks on behalf of many of the 6058 who objected to the AGL proposal.  They are still out there somewhere, ready to be heard once more. 

In commenting on the article ‘Question time’, Meg challenges the ‘decision makers’ and writes: 
  My questions to these people are why so long?  Why the delay?  Why can't there be a clear and concise plan, one that has definite timelines for achievement and evaluation?  A plan that has ‘teeth’, not waffle words, rules not merely recommendations which unfortunately can be overturned.  Isn't Westernport and its surrounds important enough?  

  Why is it so difficult?  Local residents and many visitors recognise the areas’ importance.  The health of Western Port and its surrounds affects the health of fauna and flora for generations to come.  
  "We humans don't have the luxury of time.  Many opportunities have been lost to procrastination and political point scoring.  So, get on with it. Let's see some action and real communication.”

 
Some other plans in play
  • Victoria’s Climate Change Strategy
  • Victoria’s Infrastructure Strategy 2021-2051
  • Federal Government’s:  $100-million to manage ocean habitats and coastal environments
6 Comments
Barbara Oates
8/10/2021 12:58:02 pm

Neil, thank you for stirring my emotion and passion for the our local environment. I am sure we do have the power to make change and I take on Megs words:
"We humans don't have the luxury of time. Many opportunities have been lost to procrastination and political point scoring. So, get on with it. Let's see some action and real communication.”

Reply
Julia link
8/10/2021 03:44:45 pm

Thank you again Neil, for keeping us updated about what's happening on the increasingly urgent front, to protect, and regenerate the wonderful and unique environment of Westernport Bay.
The work to optimise and give real political teeth to existing strategies and plans is long overdue, particularly in its recognition of the legal standing of the Bay as a living entity with inherent rights to exist without exploitation.

Reply
Kelvin Thomson
9/10/2021 01:26:29 pm

Thanks for your commitment Neil, Westernport Bay is much safer for your dedication. Kelvin Thomson

Reply
Hugh Kirkman link
9/10/2021 05:06:01 pm

Well done Neil. There are so many things relying on a sustainable strategy. Sequestration of CO2, Ramsar site, seagrass, mangrove, saltmarsh, nursery areas for fish nd crustacea, clean water for humans (swimming, fishing, diving), reduced land-based sources of pollution, Stable coastal edges to prevent erosion,

Reply
Ian Stevenson link
11/10/2021 05:17:06 pm

Neil's persistence to raise awareness of this concept is noteworthy.
Of specific focus, Western Port will benefit from an innovative strategic plan with particular focus on climate change effects and adaptation.
While SECCCA developed a useful map of inundation for WP many years ago, its translation into a subsequently robust awareness item must be of value to many audiences. The scoping of such a study may need to be developed by a key agency such as Melbourne Water. The Western Port Seagrass Partnership is currently conducting some collaboration with other parties to tease out support for such a study including action planning. It should ultimately require acceptance from government and community.

Reply
Vanessa
8/11/2021 04:33:43 pm

Your commitment to the environmental issues in the Western Port is outstanding. Thank you for fighting for our childrens' future.

Reply



Leave a Reply.