Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Home June 18
  • News
    • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Writers
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Jordan Crugnale
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Phil Wright
    • Robert Scott
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
    • Zoe Geyer
  • Features
  • Bass Coast Prize
  • Arts
  • Local history
  • Environment
  • Special interest
    • Birdwatching >
      • Birdwatching
    • Cooking with Pip
    • Foreign Correspondent
    • From the pantry
    • Gardening
  • Comments
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
  • Contact us

Still no on Harmers subdivision

19/5/2022

2 Comments

 
Picture
By Catherine Watson

THE council has rejected the latest attempt to subdivide a large swamp block at Harmers Haven, declaring the proposal would contribute to the decline and fragmentation of indigenous vegetation and degradation of the coastline.
​
The 1.3 hectare block at 60-76 Viminaria Road adjoins the Kilcunda-Harmers Haven Coastal Reserve, which is part of the Yallock-Bullock Marine and Coastal Park.
The officers’ report noted attempts to subdivide the block dating back to 1965, when a seven-lot subdivision was approved but did not proceed.

The Planning Appeals Board (forerunner of VCAT) rejected a 13-lot subdivision in 1987, citing the environmental significance of the swamp paperbark heathland which makes up the bulk of the block.

The current subdivision proposal was for two residential blocks, one of 1287sqm, the other of 1.016 hectares, with the majority of the larger block considered too wet for development.
The application proposed to remove a total of 0.339 hectares of vegetation, almost a third of the block, including the two building envelopes, road access and drainage works.
PictureThe coastal dune scrub on the block is a depleted vegetation class within the Gippsland bioregion.
The officers’ report noted the high quality and value of this vegetation, with the site containing some of the last examples of particular ecological classes within the region.

The site is considered central to the drainage system of much of the residential area of Harmers  and every winter much of it floods. The report noted concerns about whether the proposed development could appropriately manage the storm flows during storm events, which may result in on-site or off-site impacts.

The owners will still be able to use the block for a single dwelling.

The council received 24 objections to the application and five submissions in support. The Harmers Haven Residents and Ratepayers Group also opposed the application after surveying their members.

Supporting the motion to refuse a permit, Cr Leticia Laing said the site had a long history of development proposals. “Even back in 1987 the land was recognised for its importance. This report relates the biodiversity concerns and the impact this development would have.

Cr Bruce Kent said he felt for the owners of the property. “But my concerns are in regard to our coast and he pressure put on it. This is a part of our bushland that shouldn’t be touched.” ​

Picture
Harmers swamp 'under threat'
May 4, 2022 - Attempts to subdivide the swamp have been rebuffed for 70 years. John Old hopes the latest attempt will be treated the same way.  ​

2 Comments
Joan Woods
20/5/2022 01:02:59 pm

Our coastal fringe is very precious and it's biodiversity is being corrupted everywhere in Aust.
Good Work keep up the momentum of objections.

Reply
Yvonne McRae
20/5/2022 05:13:28 pm

Here we go again . No No No to development of this precious place. There is only 13% of the natural bush left in the BC Shire , Leave the little that remains alone. Our coastal reserves, middens, native flora and fauna are all under pressure. Enjoy it as it is. The owners can build a dwelling on their block, be happy that you have such a priceless piece of land. Yvonne

Reply



Leave a Reply.