Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent editions
  • News
  • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Contributors
    • Anabelle Bremner
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Dyonn Dimmock
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Julie Paterson
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Aldred
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Oliver Jobe
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Richard Kemp
    • Rob Parsons
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
  • Features
    • Features 2024
    • Features 2023
    • Features 2022
    • Features 2021
    • Features 2020
    • Features 2019
    • Features 2018
    • Features 2017
    • Features 2016
    • Features 2015
    • Features 2014
    • Features 2013
    • Features 2012
  • Arts
    • Arts
  • History
    • Local history
  • Environment
    • Environment
  • Nature notes
    • Nature notes
  • A cook's journal
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
    • Stories
  • About the Post

​The views have it

24/1/2024

5 Comments

 
Picture"Within each precinct it is important to acknowledge the distinction between built up areas where houses have view line potential and 'nature walk' areas. In built up areas, middle storey clearing and the use of a mix of low growing indigenous species ... is recommended."
CORINELLA homeowners have won their battle for a sea view. The long awaited Corinella Foreshore Landscape Plan, recently released by the Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action (DEECA), states that vegetation may be thinned or cleared in residential areas with "view line potential".

​The plan is the latest chapter in a bitter dispute between those who believe the foreshore reserve should be a natural environment that provides habitat for wildlife and those who want a more manicured foreshore, with bay views for homeowners.

​Whether the plan is a victory for common sense or environmental vandalism depends on your point of view. John Lippmann and Jenny Date put the case for and against.

A fine balance
By John Lippmann

In my view DEECA has tried very hard to balance competing interests. There are extremists at both ends. People who want to let everything grow and plant out areas and others who want to completely clear much broader areas. Neither side is going to be happy.
​
DEECA’s philosophy has been to try to balance the environmental values of the reserve with the cultural heritage and social and economic values. I think they’ve achieved that.

One of the DEECA team once said “If everyone is equally unhappy, we’ve probably done our job.”

The plan recommends clearing the smaller dead stuff on the ground to reduce the fire risk and some mid-storey thinning. I don’t think there’s going to be any wholesale clearing. DEECA’s not going to come in and chop out a whole area. They’re the Department of Environment and not environmental vandals. They don’t want to wreck the environment or undermine the wildlife. The Plan indicates that the canopy will be retained which will provide habitat for birds and other wildlife, maintain shade and shelter and, I imagine, much of the live growth below.

The Friends of Corinella Foreshore group is very negative about DEECA and about the committee of management as local proxy for DEECA. We put the plan up on our website as soon as it was released. If you ask me or anyone on the committee, we don’t know any more than what’s in the plan and details of when and how it will be implemented. It will be a long process.

One of the things we were worrying about is how we interpret it. DEECA told us they will come and do the initial works so our committee, and following committees, will know exactly what can and can’t be done.

DEECA is working on implementation at the moment. They’re going through due process to establish what they can and can’t do. They’re sorting out permissions and they'll  do some works and then we’ll all have more of an idea of what that means.

I’ve heard concerns that there could be substantial clearing in front of newer estates on the Western Precinct but I really don’t think that’s going to happen. If anyone wants to clear vegetation they’ll have to go through due process with DEECA and the council. There’s not going to be wholesale destruction of native flora.

The Plan suggests they’ll be getting rid of the dead stuff and any future planting in front of houses will be low growing except for when they’re replacing trees that have been illegally removed which will likely be replaced by the same or similar stock.

Some residents were anticipating getting all their sea views back. I said “Don’t count your chickens before they hatch”. I don’t believe there’ll be wholesale clearing.

Dr John Lippmann is chair of the Corinella Foreshore Committee of Management appointed by DEECA.

Foreshore under threat
By Jenny Date

​THE beautiful coastal environment of the Corinella Foreshore is under threat. Residents attracted by the environmental beauty of the place are very worried. The recently published DEECA landscape plan entitles residents to apply for a permit from the Bass Coast Shire Council to reduce vegetation to achieve views. The concern is if too many do this, we will lose valuable habitat for our vulnerable fauna and birds.

Some in the community feel they are entitled to a "view" and believe they should be able to remove vegetation blocking it. They want the removal of understorey and trees, to create a more manicured look and to allow properties lining the foreshore to have “views” without any thought of the impact this would have on our native fauna.

A small group has lobbied DEECA until it agreed to a landscape plan which sanctions this removal. Of great concern is the fact that the draft landscape plan first published in 2022 has been considerably altered to allow even more clearing of vegetation for view lines.

Extensive understorey clearing of shrubs to achieve view lines will be permitted with a permit. If all the residents in a particular area decide to do this there will a serious degradation of the foreshore. We have so little of the original flora left in the area that surely we must recognise the need to protect it.

One of the many joys of walking our foreshore track is seeing echidnas, wombats, kangaroos and the many lizards and bird species which the understorey supports. To observe the black cockatoos feasting on the she oak nuts is a special sight. Most residents and visitors notice how the bush on the bay side protects them from the strong winds. Removal of this bush, even in sections, would end this protection.

We live by Western Port, listed as an internationally significant wetland under the international Ramsar convention Many Corinella locals record fauna and bird life, rescue sick animals, plant mangroves, spray weeds, take photographs, and have a daily walk or bike ride along the foreshore. All appreciate how lucky we are to have this gem on our doorstep and that it must be protected and enhanced for the future, at all costs.

We feel DEECA is behaving in a manner totally unsympathetic to the needs of our foreshore and indeed with their stated aims to mitigate climate change. We have taken our concerns to the Ombudsman but the Ombudsman has very little power to pursue this environmentally damaging landscape plan. We were told there is no evidence of improper conduct, despite the damage to the environment that can occur.
​
We urgently need support to prevent DEECA from enacting this disastrous landscape plan.

Jenny Date is a member of Friends of the Corinella Foreshore Reserve.
Picture
Trees versus views
April 22, 2023 - THE Corinella foreshore has become the battleground for a bitter dispute between those who believe the foreshore reserve should be a natural environment that provides habitat for native birds and animals and those who want a more manicured foreshore, with bay views for homeowners.

5 Comments
Meryl Tobin link
26/1/2024 01:29:26 pm

Thanks for setting out the differing values and points of view about how best to care for our foreshores so clearly, John and Jenny.
As a regular walker in Corinella, especially along the coastline, I was appalled when I read how even more of the natural environment is threatened to go with the new Corinella Foreshore Landscape Plan. Earlier I had filled in a survey full of Before and After photos and illustrations of what was there now and what was envisaged. Over and over I was saying the Before photos and illustrations were the way to go, not the After photos and illustrations which were turning a coastal bush area into a botanic gardens.
This isn’t to knock the beauty of either appreciation of our environment or to knock even a so-called balanced view. All have a beauty.
However, when we live in a society increasingly diminishing our natural environment and endangering the ability of the human race to survive, we’ve got to restore a balance that is grossly out-of-kilter. Instead of aiming to do that, this plan takes the miserable amount left of our natural bush that has evolved over aeons and wants to ‘pretty’ it up for ‘views’. Corinella already has little natural bush left after huge, and, in my eyes, inappropriate residential developments, with more in the making.
If people want something other than what this precious little coastal village has to offer, why not go where the environment is already diminished to what they see as beautiful instead of turning something unique into an urban coastal town with manicured lawns and views and token bush areas?

Reply
Marie M
26/1/2024 09:47:16 pm

The DEECA landscape plan does not say that it entitles residents to apply for a permit from the Bass Coast Shire Council to achieve views. You are scaremongering making an outrageous statement. DEECA made extensive consultation with the community prior to doing the plan. The plan is balanced and fair between vegetation and community amenity. Biodiversity is improved in this balanced foreshore plan. You fail to mention that the foreshore was deliberately over planted to block out views with species NOT in the EVC back in 2005 and with no scientific based evidence or community consultation. Thank you for pointing out that the ombudsman mentions that there is no evidence of improper conduct on DEECA's behalf as they appointed specialised professionals to ensure maintenance and support of foreshore vegetation fire risk and social amenity are all in order including indigenous species and the importance of following the EVC for future generations to follow.

Reply
Corinella Foreshore Committee link
27/1/2024 11:35:22 am

In response to Jenny Date’s comments there are numerous claims that need to be addressed so that readers are not misinformed:
- The Plan does not mention permits or indicate any change to the existing permit system
- The environment at Corinella is not under threat
- Many residents attracted by the environment are comfortable with the Plan as, overall, it should enhance the beauty of this coastal township
- Most habitat will be protected
- Liking a sea view and regard for flora and fauna are not mutually exclusive
- DEECA went to extensive public consultation before finalising the Plan. It is incorrect to say a small group had so much influence
- The draft Plan was altered subsequent to public consultation with extensive feedback, not through lobbying
Sensible vegetation management does not exclude protection of native fauna.
The Corinella Foreshore Committee of Management

Reply
Maschette Wayne
28/1/2024 06:01:03 pm

I see on this Bass Coast post that people are debating the Corinella Foreshore Landscape plan. Two posts mention that it includes a "manicured lawn" scenario. I have read it a couple of times and I cannot find any page that mentions the concept of "manicured lawns" and the landscape plan. Are there some "Porky Pies" in use here to try to support the objection to the plan??
Seems to me that if you cannot debate the pros and cons of the Foreshore Landscape plan without going to "Porky Pies" we need to call you out. I will apologise to anyone who gives me the Landscape plan page number that you can inform me of the "manicured lawns" statement. Mind you I believe it is a "Porky Pie" to try to substantiate your opinion what the Corinella Foreshore should look like

Reply
Friends of Corinella Foreshore Reserve
29/1/2024 07:40:41 pm

The community does not know what is going on past the release of the Corinella Foreshore Landscape Management Plan. This plan was released nearly 3 months ago.
With no community briefing by DEECA following the release, the issue is very simple. This is what the community sees across all precincts:

Vegetation Management
Level 2 = Level 1+ Middle story clearing to allow water views and reduce fire risk

September 2023: On the Committees website DEECA walk-through
Pat Lambert and Tamika Lovett conducted a walk-through of the Reserve with some members of the Corinella Foreshore Reserve Committee of Management (CoM) to review the area before the up-coming summer and assess the appropriateness of the Landscape Plan, which is expected to be released within about 4-6 weeks.
What was the outcomes from that walk through?

The Chair of the CoM, John Lippmann, states above:
“I don’t believe there will be wholesale clearing”.
John states DEECA will come and do the initial works:
Questions we would ask the Committee to follow up with DEECA following this article are:
Q: What are the initial works?
Q: When will the works start?
Q: Where are the works going to start?
Q: Will these works be tendered out?
Q: What type of approvals are required?
Q: Has a priority list been created, and will the community get to see the works schedule?
We would imagine the CoM would have control over these priorities as they are the appointed managers of the Reserve on behalf of the community.

John states above - If anyone wants to clear vegetation, they’ll have to go through due process with DEECA and the council.
Q: That sounds like anyone can apply for a permit - is that the case?
Q: Who is the responsible authority for issuing the permits and are the permit applications publicly advertised?
Q: Why was it released if DEECA are still working out what they can and can’t do?
We feel it is important for DEECA to speak to the community about the plan that has now been released.
It is a grossly altered document compared to the one the community commented on the Engage Victoria website back in early 2022 - Draft plan v4. We were supplied with reference documents to assist with our responses at the time.
It was more than surprising that the vegetation plant list of the Corinella foreshore reserve that was mapped in detail, created in 2020 (paid for by DEECA) was not used as reference guide in the released plan but instead the broader EVC groupings created back in the late 1990's has been used.
Whether recommendations by Orchard Design in the CFRLP are delivered this year or in five years’ time this document will be open to interpretation by the community and any Corinella Foreshore Reserve Committee’s going forward.
This is a live working document in its current form regardless of any interpretation presented in the comments from above.

John states above: The Friends of Corinella Foreshore group is very negative about DEECA and about the committee of management as local proxy for DEECA.

This is an interesting statement from John as this group has worked with the CoM to install bird boxes. The only reference the CoM has made on their website (Nov snapshots) about the work, or the people involved (with no acknowledgement to the group) is that they were interested citizens.

Well, they have that right.

Friends of the Corinella Foreshore Reserve

Reply



Leave a Reply.