Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent articles
  • News
    • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Writers
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Julie Paterson
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Richard Kemp
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
  • Features
    • Features 2024
    • Features 2023
    • Features 2022
    • Features 2021
    • Features 2020
    • Features 2019
    • Features 2018
    • Features 2017
    • Features 2016
    • Features 2015
    • Features 2014
    • Features 2013
    • Features 2012
  • Arts
  • Local history
  • Environment
  • Nature notes
    • Nature notes
  • A cook's journal
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
    • Stories
  • Contact us

Bigger - or better?

25/1/2024

3 Comments

 
Picture
The developers are eyeing the prize and working out how to maximise the carve-up.
By Mark Robertson
 
THE announcement of 5000 new houses and an extra 12,000 people for Wonthaggi will have a huge impact on the character and future of our town, virtually doubling the size and population.
 
I hope this expansion has been planned carefully so the character and liveability of old Wonthaggi is retained and enhanced, not swallowed by a plague of big houses on small blocks, corporate warehouses full of largely unnecessary “goods” and poorly thought out access roads.
One doesn’t need to travel far - Cranbourne, Berwick, Pakenham - to view the billboards for new estates featuring cute kangaroos and happy children, and proclamations of “unique, sustainable communities”. The reality is suburban ghettoes with poor public transport, traffic snarls and sterile public spaces. Wonthaggi deserves better.

​
The developers are already circling (literally) in their shiny black helicopter, eyeing the prize and working out how to maximise the carve-up, while dealing with pesky wildlife and cultural heritage and drainage issues. Fortunately the poor old Powlett River is handy to flush away the residues.
 
I’m sure the real estate agents will be perusing the latest Maserati brochures and the municipal seat warmers are busy expanding the shire’s coffers in readiness for the rates bonanza.
 
The architects of this revolution need to understand that Wonthaggi is not some greenfield development playground – rather we are a community with a proud and fascinating social history, natural history and a palpable heart and soul. This was evident at the recent fortnight of history talks at the Wonthaggi & District Historical Society, where the 700 attendees learned about our shuttlecock factory, railway line, Italian coal mines, local newspapers, even `60s rock bands.
Wonthaggi is not some greenfield development playground – rather we are a community with a proud and fascinating social history, natural history and a palpable heart and soul. 
Shire staff, councillors and developers were conspicuous by their absence. If they want to inspire and support those of us who already call this place home they should take the time to research what really makes Wonny a bit special.  
 
Fortunately our upgraded hospital and schools are coping with demand so far, but other facilities need establishing and upgrading – and I don’t mean just more big brand shops and footy grounds.
 
Several needs spring immediately to mind. We need a town square for a community gathering place. Apex Park connects the rail tail, historical enclave and main shops but it’s currently a bit shit – very soggy during the wet season and has poor access down the embankment to the rail trail.
 
The old tech school site is the other elephant in the room. Much of it will probably be demolished but perhaps the trade wing could be repurposed for use by artisans, along with a market space in the short term at least. That’s easily achievable cultural enrichment.
 
The State Coal Mine is a vital part not just of our history but our future, and an example of how our town and community moved on from a coal economy – 60 years ago. Other coal communities could learn from our experience.
 
The dithering of “responsible authorities” is disgraceful and is sapping the enthusiasm of many dedicated and knowledgeable volunteers. Perhaps the first task for the money makers could be to sort out this issue – it might even be tax deductible and would certainly earn them some Brownie points.
 
Directing large traffic volumes through Fullers Road, Griffiths Street and Wentworth Road is not a long-term solution. I’m already noticing more and more vehicles using these routes – a proper bypass and access is essential sooner rather than later.
 
In summary, we can either have the heart of Wonthaggi torn out and sacrificed to the gods of Progress or develop a more sustainable and liveable home for our residents and ratepayers, avoiding the greenwash, corporate greed and anonymous urban ghettoes which appear to be the norm.
 
I know which I would choose for my grandkids.
 
Mark Robertson was born in Wonthaggi and has lived here all his life apart from his university years. He currently lives in North Wonthaggi. 
3 Comments
Bernie McComb
27/1/2024 10:46:06 am

The Shire so keen on urban forest but approving building permits on small blocks, for houses so big, no room for any trees. UN even published report, for Local rather than National governments, with much advice, particularly house size no more than 40% of block size. To make trees more practical, how about ban block boundary fences?

Reply
Anne Heath Mennell
27/1/2024 01:17:01 pm

I echo your concerns, Mark, and agree with your final paragraph. Surely we can learn from experiences elsewhere and do better? Long term viability and wellbeing of residents should weigh more than dollars and profits.
The Plan talks about '90 hectares of open space' being included, which sounds wonderful. However, from the map I've seen, these consist of small, disconnected blobs of green, presumably playgrounds or similar and one larger area containing two ovals. There doesn't seem to be any connectivity between them (street trees don't count, except for birds) and they appear to be too small to provide worthwhile habitat.
Will the block sizes allow for productive gardens and trees?
Will the estate roads be wide enough for buses?
So many other questions ...

Reply
Robyn Arianrhod
10/2/2024 09:07:46 am

Thank-you for raising these concerns, Mark. Like you (and like those writing in the "Wonthaggi hopes and fears" article in this edition of the Post, and in the comments on both pieces), I hope that planners and councillors - and voters! - listen, before Wonthaggi loses its heart and soul forever. I'm not optimistic: I wrote a similar piece for the Post three years ago (https://www.basscoastpost.com/point-of-view/the-winds-of-change), but my hope that the government would moderate its proposed plan to "outsource" some of Melbourne's population problems to Wonthaggi has now been dashed. It really is an unfair ask that our population should be expected to more than double, so quickly, and I join the call for clever, sensitive, engaged planning for this increasing population, not profit-making, KPIs and box-ticking. Otherwise we'll be lamenting, "You don't know what you've got till it's gone..."

Reply



Leave a Reply.