Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent articles
  • News
    • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Writers
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Jordan Crugnale
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Phil Wright
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
    • Zoe Geyer
  • Features
  • Arts
  • Local history
  • Environment
  • Bass Coast Prize
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
  • Contact us

‘5000 trucks a day’ forecast

22/9/2022

10 Comments

 
Picture
By Catherine Watson
 
FREIGHT Victoria has identified the Bass Highway as the major freight route for sand, rock and gravel from projected vast new mines between Leongatha and Inverloch.
 
Extractive Industries of South Gippsland, Supply Chain Study identifies a 160km journey from Leongatha South via the Bass Highway as the preferred haulage route to Melbourne, with potentially devastating consequences for  Inverloch, Wonthaggi, Dalyston, Kilcunda and Grantville.
 
The 2019 study concludes demand for extractive resources from South Gippsland will increase rapidly from below 4 million tonnes in 2015 to over 24 million tonnes by 2050.

It estimates more than 2500 x 40 tonne truck movements per day by 2025 and more than 5000 by 2050, ie. one every 17 seconds over 24 hours a day seven days a week. ​
“The preferred routes for extractive resources from South Gippsland to markets in Greater Melbourne and beyond are from Leongatha via the Bass Highway, and from Lang Lang via the South Gippsland Highway."
Extractive Industries of South Gippsland, Supply Chain Study
PictureSouth Gippsland supply chain study area.
"The projected increase in truck journeys will have significant impacts in terms of amenity, noise and safety, particularly through urban areas and rural towns,” according to the report.
 
“Damage to roads will also increase, resulting in increased road maintenance costs and an associated increase in congestion and traffic delays, alongside significant safety issues.”
 
And it says local government will share responsibility with state government and industry for construction and maintenance of these roads.
 
The freight study is based on a 2016 report by corporate accounting firm PWC that identified South Gippsland (including Bass Coast) as the most critical resource location for sand and hard rock supplies for future construction in Melbourne.
 
Bass Coast geologist Ted Minty said a 2019 review by the Geological Survey of Victoria (GSV) concluded there was insufficient geotechnical evidence to support PWC’s conclusions. “Yet the Government has continued to rely on this flawed PWC report to support sand mining in the Western Port Woodlands.”
 
He said future extraction of sand/gravel and basalt at Leongatha South for Greater Melbourne, with haulage via the Bass Highway, would cause massive disruption to the communities of Bass Coast, a massive cost to the consumer and a massive burden on the Victorian taxpayer.
 
Mr Minty was commissioned by community group Save Western Port Woodlands (SWPW) to do a desktop study identifying alternative sand supplies in Victoria outside areas of high biodiversity.
 
He says larger reserves of sand and gravel are located much closer to Melbourne on low value farmland in Cardinia and Baw Baw shires with access to Melbourne via freeway and rail. 

PictureLatrobe Valley Express, Sept 6, 1994
The last detailed geophysical testing was done in 1994, when a resource of 500 million tonnes of construction grade sand was identified on a 30km² area of cleared farmland north of Trafalgar, in Baw Baw Shire. 
 
At the time, the deputy secretary of the Department of Minerals and Energy estimated there was enough sand to meet Melbourne’s needs for the next 100 years.
 
The resource was valued at $6 billion at the time, with the local shire president saying it could create enormous resource wealth for the shire.
 
In the 28 years since then, the Trafalgar sand resource has not been exploited and no further substantial testing has been done in Victoria.
 
Mr Minty found successive state governments have failed to identify and assess alternative mineral resources essential for Victoria’s long-term building needs.
 
“Long-term planning for Victoria’s resource supplies is hampered not just by a lack of data but also by a lack of a vision. An efficient supply chain should align with long-term urban planning models for South East Melbourne and use existing road and rail infrastructure without causing unnecessary damage to Victorian transport infrastructure.
 
“The general geology of the Melbourne Supply Area suggests there are extensive sheets of sand/gravel north of the Princes Highway in the shires of Cardinia and Baw Baw associated with the Haunted Hills Gravel stratigraphic unit.
 
“If large deposits of sand/gravel could be developed here, it would give close access to the Princes Highway on relatively low-value agricultural land and with considerable cost savings on transport compared to extraction from the Western Port Sunklands in Bass Coast and South Gippsland.”
 
Mr Minty said these alternate deposits present minimal risk to the environment and minimal impact on transport infrastructure. Darnum appears a logical site to develop a major hub for the distribution of sand/gravel to Greater Melbourne by rail and road (the Princes Highway).
 
“The ongoing exploitation of sand and gravel beneath the Western Port Woodlands, the last significant remnant forest in the Gippsland Plains bioregion, represents very poor governance by the responsible authorities in both environmental and economic terms.” ​

10 Comments
Meryl Tobin link
23/9/2022 10:03:56 am

A commonsense look at the sand problem in Bass Coast and South Gippsland, thanks, Catherine Watson and Ted Minty. If some politicians and others in positions to make a difference and some others can’t see or pretend they can’t see a value in remnant native vegetation or can't appreciate how essential biodiversity and sustainable development are to the continuation of a comfortable life on this planet are, maybe they will appreciate how galling sharing their highways with 5,000 sand trucks a day will be.

Reply
Bernie McComb
23/9/2022 10:24:51 am

How about, if they’re crazy enough to keep peddling this catastrophe, provision needs to be made, immediately, for transport by rail not road? Until 1970s, this sand supplied glass factory under Westgate Bridge BY RAIL. One train can save as many as 115 truck trips.

Reply
Edward Minty
21/10/2022 08:32:54 pm

Bernie, you are absolutely correct. The key to economical low-impact supply of construction materials to Melbourne is to maximise the use of rail.

Reply
Tim Herring
23/9/2022 04:18:28 pm

I think the difference with Ted's approach is that he describes the problem - in this case sand mining in the 3% of remaining woodland in the Bass Coast - and presents the solution - get sand from cleared, poor quality grazing land with better connections to Melbourne (train, large freeway etc.)
A politician I spoke to said this was much more convincing than the usual approach from voters of "xxx is a terrible problem, what are you going to do about it?"

Here's the problem, here's a good solution, how can we help you (the politicians) to propose the changes necessary?
Much better approach Ted, Catherine!

Sand mining is essential for building roads, houses and offices;
How can we extract it in a better way, without destroying valuable ecosystems?
Any politician looking for votes would be a mug to go past this one!

Reply
jeni
23/9/2022 10:06:11 pm

Sand mining may be essential (and we can radically reduce our reliance on it), but it is not the only ingredient that can be used in concrete. Stockpiles of recycled glass exist all over Australia. Using waste as a resource makes a lot of sense, particularly if each local government area makes it part of their waste management system. Sustainable models of business that embrace the circular economy are already flourishing, it makes a lot more sense than digging it up and paying for it's disposal in landfill.
Jeni Jobe Community Independent for Bass

Reply
Anne Heath Mennell
23/9/2022 04:27:24 pm

A clear, compelling and evidence based outline of a catastrophic situation. Is anyone planning to duplicate the two highways BEFORE they start digging?
I hope all candidates will receive a copy of this article. I look forward to hearing their responses at the meeting in Corinella on 8 October.

Reply
Jeni
23/9/2022 10:11:22 pm

Love your article Neil, thanks for sending me the link.

Little over seeing the sand from Bass Coast being called cheap sand. It’s not cheap sand if taxpayers spend billions on road maintenance and upgrades. We have other options of using ground glass ect that would make use of the stockpiles of recycling. A circular economic model of using our waste as a resource.

Sandmining is not just ripping up remnant forests and wreaking havoc on our biodiversity, it’s trashing our roads and you better believe it is going to effect every person, emergency service and business that needs them.

Jeni Jobe Community Independent Candidate for the Seat of Bass

Reply
Felicia Di Stefanp
24/9/2022 04:13:48 pm

Thank you, Catherine and hard working group for advocating for our emblems of nature and for our infrastructure.
As well as the interesting proposals in the article, we may consider the use of various substances to replace sand; recycled glass, pulverised demolition materials, manufactured sand, recycled plastics. We could be at the forefront of new renewable industries, employing people and exporting the products. In this way, large companies could still make lots of money not cart sand long distances, and leave us our treasured beauty.

Reply
Mark Robertson
28/9/2022 01:59:44 pm

The new Bunnings site in wonthaggi is using recycled aggregate, made from old concrete and bricks, produced less than 2km away. So, no landfill, no long distance truck movements and no digging up the Bush. Even the old steel reinforcing goes back for recycling. Simple wins all round, and a glimpse at what our construction future should be.

Reply
Edward Minty
21/10/2022 08:43:54 pm

Thats true Mark, but the use of recycled aggregate at the Bunnings site has been limited to increasing the bearing capacity of the clay-rich sub-grade prior to setting out the formwork for concrete footings/foundations. When the concrete rolls in to construct the foundations it will probably contain sand/gravel from Grantville. That wouldn't be a problem if Grantville only supplied a limited amount of material for local construction. However when the wand polishers in Spring St decide that the Western Port Woodlands is going to be the major source of sand/gravel for Greater Melbourne, then by 2050 we are going to be left with a huge pit that will rival the residual brown coal excavations at Hazelwood and Loy Yang.

Reply



Leave a Reply.