Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent articles
  • News
    • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Writers
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Julie Paterson
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Richard Kemp
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
  • Features
    • Features 2024
    • Features 2023
    • Features 2022
    • Features 2021
    • Features 2020
    • Features 2019
    • Features 2018
    • Features 2017
    • Features 2016
    • Features 2015
    • Features 2014
    • Features 2013
    • Features 2012
  • Arts
  • Local history
  • Environment
  • Nature notes
    • Nature notes
  • A cook's journal
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
    • Stories
  • Contact us

Councillor 'misunderstood' balance sheet

1/2/2018

14 Comments

 
By Catherine Watson
 
THE Victorian Auditor-General says an accountant councillor’s concerns about Bass Coast Council’s accounting practices are based on a misunderstanding of the nature and purpose of parts of the balance sheet.
A Certified Practising Accountant, Cr Les Larke was elected to the council in 2016 on a platform of reforming the council’s finances. He has long claimed that Bass Coast is in a perilous financial situation, contrary to the picture of improving finances in the council’s past two annual reports. 

Following the release of the 2016-17 annual report, Cr Larke contacted the Auditor-General, Andrew Greaves, to investigate his concerns about $35 million listed under “Other Reserves”, which includes long service leave provision of $4.662 million, $1.5 million for the Wonthaggi highball development, $3.538 million for strategic works and an unallocated reserve of $4.679 million.
 
Mr Greaves responded that Cr Larke appeared to have misunderstood the nature and purpose of components of the balance sheet: the reserves were backed by the council’s net assets, which could be converted to cash or borrowing as required. “In this regard it is not an accounting requirement that reserves are presently 'cash-backed', especially as a number of the reserves will not require cash funding in the next twelve month period.”

The Auditor General stated that he was satisfied that the council's financial statements had been properly prepared.

Cr Larke has frequently claimed that as a Certified Practising Accountant he is the only one of his council colleagues with a proper understanding of the financial reports. 

The Post asked him whether he proposed to release the Auditor-General’s response and whether his concerns on the council’s finances had been allayed.
 
He responded that he proposed to “discuss further with council as a first step in due time”.

​
While Cr Larke had the support of his fellow councillors immediately after the election, he soon lost it with repeated claims of financial mismanagement and a series of bizarre notices of motion relating to financial reporting.
 
In response to his concerns about accounting practices, the council last year invited the Victorian Auditor General to send a representative to meet with council. The auditor advised that the council accounts had received an unqualified sign-off.
 
Last July Cr Larke proposed the council should cut 46 jobs – 15 per cent of the council’s workforce – over the next three years. Most recently he has sought to allocate funds from the long service leave reserve for council employees for other purposes. Neither proposal won support from his fellow councillors.
14 Comments
Frank W Schooneveldt
2/2/2018 12:46:52 pm

Thank you for your article and a Happy New Year to you and your readers.
Councillor Les Larke has misled the people of the Bass Coast over the state of the Bass Coast’s finances and he has caused a great deal of damage to the Shire by stopping infrastructure development and calling for extreme cost saving measures which are not warranted. Councillor Larke should consider his options, including resignation.
The Council should include as part of its financial decision making process a twelve month rolling cashflow that includes information about revenue, expenditure and borrowing capacity. While this kind of statement is used more commercially it is a valuable tool in managing finances.
Cheers

Reply
Felicia Di Stefano
2/2/2018 04:27:14 pm

Thank you for your article, Catherine. I am so very relieved that our council's balance sheets balance and now it can go on to facilitate waiting projects and doing all in its power to further lower greenhouse emissions. If Cr Larke does decide to resign, I wonder whether Neil Rankin would like to step back and continue the excellent job he did during his previous term in office.

Reply
Lorrie Read
2/2/2018 05:46:15 pm

Thank goodness got the Post, at least some balance in a local news desert. Keep up the good work Catherine, I really enjoy reading your newspaper.

Reply
John Coldebella
4/2/2018 10:03:22 pm

The time has come for the Victorian Auditor-General and the rest of the Councillors to resign and let Councillor Les Larke get on with the job he was elected to do, which was to sort out the financial disaster facing us. As the only Certified Practicing Accountant in the Council village, he has all the credentials. Furthermore,the next time Bass Coast Shire CEO Paul Buckley is successful in an application for a public position, I hope he has the courtesy, civility, dignity and respect to haggle down the renumeration being offered prior to confirming his acceptance of any such position.

Reply
Frank W Schooneveldt
5/2/2018 07:22:21 am

What a spectacular rant John and you have prompted some questions in me. Can you enlighten the people of the Bass Coast with your reasoned arguments about the nature, the details of the financial disaster facing us?
You and Cr Les Larke set great store by qualifications.
Do you doubt the Victorian Auditor General’s credentials to comment on the state of the Bass Coast Finances?
John, debate is useful but should not be destructive. We all need to be positive and contribute what we can to achieve great outcomes for the Bass Coast.
Cheers

Reply
Catherine Watson
5/2/2018 01:16:02 pm

Frank, knowing John, I can reassure you that his letter was satirical.
He does raise an interesting point. How do we tell the deluded lone voice from the brilliant lone voice? There are times when the one is right and the millions are wrong.
It's probably worth looking at the calibre of the one lone voice. I would put Kevin Rudd and Tony Abbott firmly in the camp of the self-deluded. Perhaps Cr Larke belongs there too. Ego is the key.

Reply
Frank W Schooneveldt
5/2/2018 04:19:43 pm

Catherine,
Thank you for the heads up. I took John's words at face value and responded accordingly. The questions I raised still need to be answered.
Cheers

Mark Robertson
5/2/2018 12:00:07 pm

John, get your tongue out of your cheek right now, as it appears that some might think you are serious!

Reply
Phyllis Papps
6/2/2018 10:08:05 am

Catherine is absolutely right. EGO is the key.
Once, many, many years ago when I became a Board member of Bass Coast Community Health Service, someone said to me "leave your ego out of the door." AND that is precisely what Cr. Les Larke and other Councillors should do. They were voted by the community to represent us, not be self-serving or self- deluded.

Reply
julie tyrrell
7/2/2018 10:12:31 am

Maybe he should just resign. How much time and money has been wasted, with no outcome?.

Reply
Albie Goode
8/2/2018 01:59:13 pm

and whatsmore, he got voted in solely on that platform! Wasted time and money but at least his efforts have proved that Bass is in not a bad shape financially and that the administration is quite sound - which is what the other Councillors have been saying pretty much since they got in. I agree - please resign Cr Larke and let someone who has a clue take your place

Reply
Bob Middleton
8/2/2018 08:53:53 am

Thank you for the wisdom couched in suchr typical humour John and thank you Catherine for carrying the heavy part of the load. A great issue to start off the new year.

Reply
Phil Bagley
6/3/2018 07:44:39 am

Mr Greaves responded that Cr Larke appeared to have misunderstood the nature and purpose of components of the balance sheet: the reserves were backed by the council’s net assets, which could be converted to cash or borrowing as required. “In this regard it is not an accounting requirement that reserves are presently 'cash-backed', especially as a number of the reserves will not require cash funding in the next twelve month period.”
I always thought of "reserves" as a pot of money sitting there to cover contingencies but it seems I am wrong.
As I now u nderstand it a "reserve" is in fact a debt owing for which cash will have to be raised by selling assets borrowing or increasing rates as happened with the demand for more cash to cover old super schemes.
This all appears smoke and mirrors to me as I have never used creative accounting methods. Think I will stick with the CPA councillor. This sort of creative nonsense is what destroyed Victoria under the Cain Kirner governments. A debt is a debt not a "reserve"

Reply
Phil Bagley
6/3/2018 07:45:07 am

I believe the correct term for "reserves" should correctly be called UNFUNDED LIABILITIES if in fact there is no cash in the account

Reply



Leave a Reply.