Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent articles
  • News
    • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Writers
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Julie Paterson
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Richard Kemp
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
  • Features
    • Features 2024
    • Features 2023
    • Features 2022
    • Features 2021
    • Features 2020
    • Features 2019
    • Features 2018
    • Features 2017
    • Features 2016
    • Features 2015
    • Features 2014
    • Features 2013
    • Features 2012
  • Arts
  • Local history
  • Environment
  • Nature notes
    • Nature notes
  • A cook's journal
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
    • Stories
  • Contact us

'Resolve mining conflict first'

20/5/2022

3 Comments

 
PictureSand Supplies mine, Gurdies Nature Conservation Reserve
By Catherine Watson
 
BASS Coast Shire Council is calling on the State Government to fulfil its charter to protect the environment and biodiversity in the face of a surge in sand mining that threatens the shire’s last major forest.

In its submission on a draft Bass Coast Statement of Planning Policy (SPP), the council challenges the Government to put protection of biodiversity and threatened species first in the crucial 50-year plan for the shire.

The draft policy fails to acknowledge, let alone resolve, the inherent conflict between sand mining and the environment in the forest corridor between Lang Lang and Grantville, according to the council submission.

“[The policy] must recognise that extractive industries are temporary land uses that cause permanent damage to the environment and scar the landscape, particularly when a resource is extracted from beneath land of high conservation value.

“It must recognise that extractive industries are a significant threat and are not consistent with section 46AN of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 that seeks the protection and conservation of the environment, including habitats, ecosystems and biodiversity.”

Councillors unanimously supported the submission at this week’s council meeting and it will now be forwarded to the Distinctive Area and Landscape (DAL) project team.

Announcing the DAL project in 2018, just weeks before the state election, Premier Daniel Andrews said it would protect Bass Coast's natural beauty and small-town lifestyle from unregulated development.

Cr Rochelle Halstead said many saw the DAL project as a way to protect one of the last significant coastal forests in the Western Port region.
​
“But it seems the Western Port Woodlands have been completely ignored by the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning.
 
“I accept that licensees have a right under state legislation through their work authorities to continue their operations but this was an opportunity for the Victorian Government to make a change and put their money where their mouth is.

“Words can’t describe the disappointment of the local community who have fought hard on this issue and should be encouraged to continue the fight.”
 
The council submission acknowledges that extractive resources are crucial for the construction of public infrastructure as well as commercial and residential buildings, but says the Bass Coast resources are of lower priority than those in other areas of Victoria and mostly in areas of high strategic biodiversity.

​Victoria has a strong legislative and policy framework to protect biodiversity and threatened species, but enforcement is a different matter, particularly when it comes to extractive resource industries. 
​
Council submission
  • ​Extraction must not take place on public land, including nature conservation reserves or beneath any areas of public or private land that has established vegetation and habitat for flora and fauna or is part of a strategic biolink.
  • Proposals to establish new or expand existing extractive industries must not be approved where a comparative resource is available elsewhere in Victoria.
  • Proposals to establish new or expand existing extractive industries must demonstrate they will not have a significant adverse impact on the integrity of vegetation and habitat or a strategic biolink.
  • Proposals to establish new or expand existing extractive industries must demonstrate the maintenance and opportunities for enhancement of connecting vegetation consistent with the strategic biolink shown within the environment and biodiversity policy domain.
  • Extraction must not adversely impact on the quality and quantity of groundwater resources or other watercourses within or beyond the extraction area including the waters of Western Port Bay which is a RAMSAR listed wetland.
  • Inclusion of the Western Port Woodlands (referred to as the Gurdies Hills in the DAL project) within the Significant Landscape Overlay Schedule.
​Read the relevant sections of the Bass Coast Shire Council submission here.
The submission points out that the draft SPP takes bold measures to protect environmental values in Newhaven, Cape Woolamai and Grantville, where settlement boundaries have been changed and development opportunities on private land removed to conserve environmental attributes.
 
“For Council to endorse the draft SPP, it must be amended to have a similarly strong position about the protection of the environmental values in the Lang Lang to Grantville Corridor. It must remove the threat of extractive resources by requiring extraction to be excluded from areas (private and public land) that support established native vegetation and which provides habitat for flora and fauna.”
 
The council requests mapping of a strategic biolink through the Lang Lang to Grantville Corridor to identiy areas where mining cannot occur.


3 Comments
anne westwood
20/5/2022 11:05:57 am

This was all covered in the Sand Strategy Lang Lang to Grantville. The Council was represented on the panel, the Strategy was signed off by the then Minister to be incorporated into the Planning Scheme. The Council has ignored the Strategy since. The Strategy was a massive step towards protecting the corridor to the East of Westernport, building on the Shapiro Report (1973-74). We are now 26 years from the SS and 50 years from The SR and the Shire is now paying lipservice to the importance of the corridor and the State Government is steadfastly ignoring its intrinsic values.

Reply
Catherine Watson, Editor
20/5/2022 12:01:25 pm

They actually refer to the Sand Strategy in the DAL submission, Anne, and have used mapping from it. First time I've actually seen it mentioned in an official document. Seems like it's back in the public arena after being lost behind a filing cabinet for 25 years!

Reply
ian Samuel
20/5/2022 03:03:34 pm

I like so many concerned Bass Coast residents are more than disappointed by the Ministers decision to allow further Sand Mining and destruction of this unique environmental corridor.
Acknowledging sadly that the ministers decision is binding, it is now crucial that the continuous reclamation of the mined area be strictly policed in accordance with the ministers conditions by an independent government authority and must include the saving of local indigenous species.

Reply



Leave a Reply.