Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent articles
  • News
    • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Contributors
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Julie Paterson
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Richard Kemp
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
  • Features
    • Features 2024
    • Features 2023
    • Features 2022
    • Features 2021
    • Features 2020
    • Features 2019
    • Features 2018
    • Features 2017
    • Features 2016
    • Features 2015
    • Features 2014
    • Features 2013
    • Features 2012
  • Arts
  • Local history
  • Environment
  • Nature notes
    • Nature notes
  • A cook's journal
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
    • Stories
  • Contact us

Surf Beach owners think small

24/2/2024

1 Comment

 
Picture
AFTER a resounding no to the grand plan to seal, pave and drain Surf Beach Sunderland Bay, (No thanks, say homeowners, Dec 13, 2023) neighbours are banding together to seek upgrades for their road.
 
The council has so far received five separate petitions relating to Batman Street, The Esplanade, Glen Street and Links Street (all Surf Beach) and Dover Street (Sunderland Bay).
 
While there are economies of scale in larger infrastructure projects, and they’re almost essential for drainage works, they are difficult to implement in the face of organised opposition.

The proposed $32 million Surf Beach Sunderland Bay scheme created bitter divisions in the community and cost the council over $500,000 before it was abandoned, with more than half the 1041 property owners rejecting it.
 
There were just 133 submissions of support, though the council later received a petition of 317 signatures requesting it not to abandon the scheme.
 
After a couple of expensive failures to progress special charge schemes in recent years (including Cape Paterson), the council said it would review its urban roads and drainage policy this year.
 
Currently, communities need to demonstrate 70 per cent support by property owners before their project can be considered for the Urban Upgrade Priority Program. There is a long waiting list of projects on the program.
 
The petitions
  1. Sealing of Batman Street, Surf Beach (39 signatures). The petition seeks a temporary sealant, such as was formerly applied to roads in the area including Batman Street. “It gave residents respite from the dust for at least a decade, and is inexpensive compared to other treatments.”
  2. The Esplanade between Sunderland Bay Road and Batman Street, Surf Beach (17 signatures). Requests road and drainage improvements. “The need for the project has been well articulated in the recently failed Special Charge Scheme documentation and in countless letters from residents about the dust, pedestrian safety and appalling drainage conditions.”
  3. Glen Street, Surf Beach (8 signatures). “The undersigned property owners respectfully request that Bass Coast Shire Council investigate alternative funding models for road and drainage improvements to our area, and present those funding models to us for consideration.
  4. Links Street, Surf Beach (9 signatures). Requests road and drainage improvements to be funded through a special charge scheme.
  5. Dover Street, Sunderland Bay (14 signatures). Requests road and drainage improvements to be funded through a special charge scheme.
 
The petitions will lie on the table with a report to be presented by the June 2024 council meeting.
1 Comment
Ian TEESE
24/2/2024 10:28:56 am

Thanks for this article on the Surf Beach / Sunderland Bay debacle and attempts to move forward. We have a house in Sunderland Bay and voted yes, even though there was minimal benefit to us from the work (and charge).

I would challenge the wording in your first sentence. Resounding No, gilds the vote. The No vote would have come from at least four types of responses:
1. Do not need improvement as already on well drained site with good road frontage (our own case but we were a Yes).

2. Bought in SB/SB as a cheaper Silverleaves so want to remain rustic.

3. Wanted the improvements done but wanted the council to pay for all the costs - forgetting that blocks in SB/SB were cheaper than elsewhere because they did not have the drainage/road improvements. They will now remain relatively cheaper.

4. Genuinely could not afford the individual block costs. This could have been addressed in different ways. Note that most blocks in SB/SB have probably gone up $100K to $200K in value over the past 2 years.

It is much easier to find reasons to vote No than Yes, as we have seen in other recent referendums like Brexit.

I hope the groups who have put in the requests are successful in getting council support for work they believe is essential.

Reply



Leave a Reply.