Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent articles
  • News
    • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Writers
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Jordan Crugnale
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Phil Wright
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
    • Zoe Geyer
  • Features
    • Features 2022
  • Arts
  • Local history
  • Environment
  • Bass Coast Prize
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
  • Contact us

Where is the vision?

30/6/2022

 
By Trevor Forge

WHEN it comes to urban planning and design, most people understand there are numerous acts, regulations and local laws that affect the way subdivisions, building developments and town plans are conceived and constructed.

In Inverloch, there is also a policy statement and a design framework to guide the implementation of every development in town, backed up by the Inverloch Strategic Framework Plan and the Town Centre Restructure Plan.
The planning objective behind all these documents is simple and succinct.
To support the development of Inverloch as a consolidated and sustainable coastal village that optimises existing natural assets and character, and services the lifestyle and recreational needs of residents and visitors.
(Clause 11.01-1L-08: Bass Coast Planning Scheme “Settlement”)


Together, these documents provide a clear roadmap for the way our community sees the future of our town and form a carefully thought out and peer-reviewed framework so that everyone understands what the community expects the nature and character of every future development will be.

Recently, however, a proposal for development of 2-4 The Esplanade, the old Inverloch Marine site, into 42 serviced apartments and two shops was placed before Bass Coast Shire Council where the planning team and councillors seem to not have fully understood such community expectations.​​​
Despite more than 60 written objections, a permit for the development has now been issued (with restrictions) that fails key principles set out in the Inverloch Design Framework for built form and density. Namely:
  • Manage built form and design in terms of height, density and architectural quality
  • Encourage a high quality design outcome with a community focus on the private land within the foreshore precinct.
  • Building height in the town centre is required to be a maximum of 9.5 metres from natural ground level to roof line 
​2-4 The Esplanade is a landmark site that has been recognised in the Planning Scheme by a site-specific Design Development Overlay (DDO10); with the DDO itself being a recommendation contained in the Inverloch Design Framework.

In addition to the points listed above, DDO10 requires the development to:
  • Protect and enhance visual permeability of the site
  • Create strong orientation toward the foreshore and integration with surrounding public open space, in particular, The Glades Picnic Ground
  • Minimise the impact of development on surrounding areas by utilising contemporary coastal design principles and landscaping

Arguably, the now approved development does not comply with these expectations.

While the applicant is clearly a builder of imagination with a recent portfolio of modern and innovative designs, there is now a very real possibility that the whole matter will descend into bickering, planning appeals and litigation as the developer and the community come to grips with a less than satisfactory outcome for both.

Why do opportunities of this nature always seem characterised by adversarial “must have – can’t have” responses that diminish everyone’s expectations? Why can’t our council work with developers to ensure community expectations like those set out in DDO10 are treated respectfully and with a sense of vision.

What was needed was engagement and imagining of this iconic location for a solution that Inverloch could be proud of – one that met the community vision for our town.
Maybe the community could have been consulted about possible uses like public art, climbing wall, all weather shade/seating and landscaping above the Glade, community facilities for The Amazon Project or the Inverloch Historical Society. Heck, why not even discuss with council the possibility of redeveloping the entire site and incorporating an updated Bunurong Environment Centre?

Unfortunately, there may now be a precedent for other developments that don’t match the community expectations outlined in the Inverloch Design Framework.

Our planning experts must do better when it comes to managing community expectations and assessing development applications against design objectives that were clearly intended to meet the community’s vision for Inverloch.
kay
1/7/2022 01:27:35 pm

Who makes all these decisions? Do they even live in Inverloch? Are they going to benefit financially or otherwise?

liana link
4/10/2022 08:21:49 pm

thanks for info

Robert Bird
21/1/2023 10:30:12 pm

With this submission going to VCAT and the South Gippsland Conservation Society going "all in" to fight this development, the services of a legal mind is required to assist the Society with its efforts. VCAT decides on legal principle, not emotion. If there is going to be any chance of a successful outcome, a legal argument (and strong one at that) will be required. Does anyone know of someone who could assist???


Comments are closed.