Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent articles
  • News
    • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Writers
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Jordan Crugnale
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Phil Wright
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
    • Zoe Geyer
  • Features
    • Features 2022
  • Arts
  • Local history
  • Environment
  • Bass Coast Prize
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
  • Contact us

The people have spoken

13/9/2019

3 Comments

 
Picture
Inverloch's beach erosion issues and shared pathway have nothing to do with each other, argues Cr Les Larke.

By Cr Les Larke

BASS Coast Shire Council recognises the importance of being community driven for the purpose of improving the overall quality of life of people in the local community.
In that regard, let me illustrate a few points on the community consultation results in relation to the Surf Parade shared pathway extension:
  • A letter was sent to all Inverloch property owners
  • A wide range of other engagement methods were used including targeted community group sessions, pop up tents, Facebook and other forms of social media and online survey conducted.
  • A high level of submissions were received
  • The result of the overall community consultation was overwhelmingly 73% in favour of the recommended Surf Parade pathway extension option 2.

To reiterate, in my view, Council’s raison d'être (reason or justification for being) is to be community driven for the purpose of improving the overall quality of life of people in the local community.

Further, the primary objective of Council is multi-faceted including the need to achieve the best outcomes for the local community having regard to the promotion of social, economic and environmental considerations.

1. Social
The benefits of walking and cycling, surfing and beach activities are extensive and well documented. Importantly, a key priority within the approved Bass Coast Shire aspirational network pathways plan is the link between Wonthaggi and Inverloch, which includes the section of pathway along Surf Parade. This pathway link is classified as a strategic cycling corridor and priority for both Council and State Government.

2. Economic
Visitor economy
Inverloch’s visitor economy is crucial to the economic sustainability of the town.
Activities which are based around Anderson inlet or the surf beaches are the core tourism products of Inverloch’s visitor economy.

Visitors to Inverloch make a conscious decision where to holiday each year, which is based on their choice over competing locations with visitor access to the beach, being the fundamental reason for choosing Inverloch as their holiday destination.

The proposed shared pathway extension for visitors of all abilities is an essential ingredient for the future viability of the local visitor economy.

Car parking
Parking along Inverloch’s main surf beach has a positive effect on the visitor experience and encourages return visitation levels. Highly valued car parking and pathways enables families and individuals of all abilities to access Inverloch’s main surf beach via gazetted beach access tracks. Essentially, access and inclusion for groups and individuals of all abilities is a key strategic priority for council.

The necessity for families to carry essential beach equipment such as, umbrellas/ sunshades, beach chairs, body / surf boards, drinks and eskies also accentuates the high value of car parking access along this area of beach.

3. Environmental
The geomorphic and ecological reports commissioned by the shire have been done by independent experts, from an unbiased neutral position using the available science and data from a variety of neutral scientific sources.

I reiterate that these are independent expert reports and not reports written from one perspective and put together by any group or individual who has a stated position and thus bias. I also recognise that stage 1 of the shared pathway was vehemently opposed by certain groups and individuals, however community and visitor usage has demonstrated a highly valued and utilised piece of public infrastructure.

Key takeaways from the independent expert reports include:
  1. The shared path alignment is adjacent to surf parade and any vegetation that is to be removed is located at the rear of the coastal dune and loss of vegetation will not have any impact on dune stability.
  2. The removal of a strip of land on the urban edge provides an opportunity to remove the exotic species and enhance the quality of this edge vegetation;
  3. Checks and balances are in place to ensure all geomorphic and ecological aspects are dealt with sensitively, and subject to all relevant approvals, permits and vegetation offset requirements.

In summary
The erosion issues and shared pathway are mutually exclusive, in other words, they are separate and very different from each other.

Clearly, we need to continue to lobby for and work towards the protection of our vital assets in relation to the erosion zones and to work towards influencing governments of all levels as to the threats of climate change and bringing about better climate outcomes.

However that said, I support the motion to endorse the Surf Parade shared pathway extension option 2, having regard to the importance of being community driven and the strategic, social, economic and environmental considerations.
​
This is Cr Les Larke’s address to the council in support of proceeding with the second stage of the Inverloch pathway despite concerns that clearing foreshore vegetation would exacerbate beach erosion.

3 Comments
Bron Dahlstrom
14/9/2019 11:23:26 pm

I do not understand how Councillor Larke, or anyone else for that matter, could view the erosion that has occurred recently and still be in favour of building the path along Surf Parade. When the meetings were held, most people would not have imagined that the erosion that has taken place would be so extreme and certainly not happen so quickly. Common sense demands that the path is not built. Expert opinion from an ecological perspective must be sought if the problem is not obvious to some Councillors, and if Councillor Clarke is so determined that the path be built because of public feedback, surely the public should be given a second chance after they have viewed the latest erosion and the implications of this for the future.

Reply
michael whelan
15/9/2019 10:58:51 am

Bron Council had access to expert opinion but chose to ignore it. The Inverloch Coastal Resilience Study undertaken by the South Gippsland Conservation Society used very credible experts, a botanical ecologist and geomorphologist. It was available but not considered. Council chose to rely on its own commissioned studies that were written in support of the shared pathway. It is pertinent to note that the option of one way for part of Surf Parade was not part of the public consultation.

Reply
Max Wells
15/9/2019 12:08:24 pm

Hi Michael,

I am not sure that’s exactly correct, the shire has been commissioning independent reports in relation to the proposed pathway for over a decade. Done by completely reputable and highly recognised in their field companies.

In relation to the removal of vegetation to build the path, the following from their most recent report.

In terms of the impacts on vegetation associated with path alignment, the following key points are made:

"The alignment has been located on the landward side of the foreshore vegetation abutting existing cleared and developed land. This is the most appropriate location for the alignment for the following reasons:

The vegetation abutting the urban development is subject to edge affects including the incursion of exotic species.
Vegetation within the middle of the reserve is likely to be ‘cleaner’ and contain higher quality vegetation.

The removal of a strip of land on the urban edge provides an opportunity to remove the exotic species and to enhance the quality of this edge vegetation."

In relation to the current erosion crisis and the pathway it appears to me that the same people who have been so strongly against the proposed path for over a decade now are using this to further push their position.

If the erosion ever reaches the proposed pathway alignment surely we have much more significant and critical problems in relation to the property owners along Surf Pde who all were allowed to build legally.
It seems to me it’s time for Inverloch to start addressing the erosion issues like the rest of the country and draw a hardline as to what our coastline will be.

We all know that community infra structure has been built on parts of the Inverloch foreshore that are subject to the changes we are now seeing. We also know that decisions we made back in the 1980’s and before to plant non indigenous species on our sand dunes has impacted on natures ability to replenish.

As a society we have made mistakes, we have also decided to build infra structure such as Life saving clubs and the road to Cape Paterson in these locations and we as a community value them.

I support the stance taken by Cr Larke we need a balanced social, economic and environmental approach towards all aspects and decision making within our shire.

The pathway is vital piece of community infra structure long over due for our town and it needs to be built.

So does a legitimate erosion and coastline plan that will protect and maintain the community assets we currently have along our foreshore.

Max Wells




Leave a Reply.