Bass Coast Post
  • Home
    • Recent editions
  • News
  • Point of view
    • View from the chamber
  • Contributors
    • Anabelle Bremner
    • Anne Davie
    • Anne Heath Mennell
    • Bob Middleton
    • Carolyn Landon
    • Catherine Watson
    • Christine Grayden
    • Dick Wettenhall
    • Dyonn Dimmock
    • Ed Thexton
    • Etsuko Yasunaga
    • Frank Coldebella
    • Gayle Marien
    • Geoff Ellis
    • Gill Heal
    • Harry Freeman
    • Ian Burns
    • Joan Woods
    • John Coldebella
    • Julie Paterson
    • Julie Statkus
    • Kit Sleeman
    • Laura Brearley >
      • Coastal Connections
    • Lauren Burns
    • Liane Arno
    • Linda Cuttriss
    • Linda Gordon
    • Lisa Schonberg
    • Liz Low
    • Marian Quigley
    • Mark Robertson
    • Mary Aldred
    • Mary Whelan
    • Meryl Brown Tobin
    • Michael Whelan
    • Mikhaela Barlow
    • Miriam Strickland
    • Natasha Williams-Novak
    • Neil Daly
    • Oliver Jobe
    • Patsy Hunt
    • Pauline Wilkinson
    • Richard Kemp
    • Rob Parsons
    • Sally McNiece
    • Terri Allen
    • Tim Shannon
  • Features
    • Features 2024
    • Features 2023
    • Features 2022
    • Features 2021
    • Features 2020
    • Features 2019
    • Features 2018
    • Features 2017
    • Features 2016
    • Features 2015
    • Features 2014
    • Features 2013
    • Features 2012
  • Arts
    • Arts
  • History
    • Local history
  • Environment
    • Environment
  • Nature notes
    • Nature notes
  • A cook's journal
  • Community
    • Diary
    • Courses
    • Groups
    • Stories
  • About the Post

Miriam Strickland

28/9/2023

0 Comments

 
For me, voting Yes to the Voice is a no-brainer.
  1. The fact that our first nations people have to politely ask to be recognised in the Constitution is a shame on us non-indigenous folk. WE should have initiated this, long ago. For me, enough said.
But also:
  1. Detractors declare the Voice would give one race more power than any other race or interest group. No, it offers the people who were here first appropriate recognition, and opportunity to provide input ON ISSUES THAT AFFECT THEM, but specifically states that it is parliament that will continue to make decisions and enact legislation. No change there. Hence point 3:
  2. People saying this referendum is divisive may be struggling to face the fact that they are the privileged ones and perhaps it’s time to let someone else in a bit. Indigenous people are asking the rest of us to walk with them, not under them, so that we can start to move forward as a cohesive, adult nation. Fighting about it is what is divisive, not the referendum itself.
  3. Finally, fear-mongers remind us that once enshrined in the Constitution, the Voice cannot be removed. Excellent! Can’t be cancelled when government changes hands or has its arm twisted.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Your voice

    We want to hear your views.
    * Have you discussed the Voice with friends/family/workmates? * Have you changed your mind?
    * Have you tried to persuade anyone?
    * Has anyone tried to persuade you?
    * Has anyone inspired you?
    * What do you think of the process?
    * What should happen if the Voice doesn't get up in the referendum?

    Maximum 200 words. Artworks, cartoons, songs and videos are also welcome.
    ​
    Please include a headshot. 
     
    Email submissions to [email protected].