I VISITED the Corinella Foreshore recently and it was a revelation. In the harsh clifftop environment, directly exposed to the prevailing south westerlies, the path west of the boat ramp wound through a wide, shaded, wind-protected microclimate created by the continuity of diverse, indigenous low trees and shrubs. Elevated vantage points provided views to Western Port.
I couldn’t help but contrast it with the foreshore path in my home town of Inverloch, which looks more like a municipal utility than a natural experience.
I drove to the northern section of the Corinella path, where the abundant birdlife on the bay spoke of the richness of the near shore marine environment.
The Friends of the Corinella Foreshore prompted my visit. They described how the beauty that I saw was a product of the sustained work of the Corinella Foreshore Committee of Management over the past 30 odd years. When they say it was the work of the committee, they don’t mean by employees, they mean by volunteers. All the co-ordination and much of the work, strategically aided by contractors when circumstances and finances allowed. The beauty of the current day is the product of persistent and consistent work by unpaid locals over decades.
Why would I find it so astounding? As a resident of Inverloch, I have experienced first hand, the coastal reserves of South Gippsland now part of the Yallock Bullock Marine and Coastal Park. In addition, I can identify with the vegetation management of the Corinella Foreshore because I was engaged in similar work for the past 40 years across the state’s urban and rural waterways. Having walked hundreds, if not thousands, of waterway frontages, including many Crown water frontage reserves, I can tell you it’s exceptionally rare to find a water frontage managed by a landowner, at times across generations, that has kept the biological values, as has the Corinella Foreshore Committee. The contrast between frontages actively managed for biodiversity and those not managed was always obvious. | The views have it Jan 24, 2024 - Corinella homeowners have won their battle for a sea view with the long awaited landscape plan by DEECA declaring that vegetation may be thinned or cleared in residential areas with "view line potential". |
The usual story is clearing, disturbance, reduction and localised extinction of indigenous plants and animals, invasion by pest plants, animals, and grazing. Suppressed, degraded and invaded, the indigenous vegetation is usually a mere shadow of its former self. Once the cattle are removed, weeds proliferate.
It has been my little joke that our visionary forebears set aside these strips of land before the rest of the land was cleared. It has only taken us 100-plus years to work out why and join them in realising their true value. In the meantime, we managed it by unrestricted grazing, just like we did the rest of the catchment.
What sets the Corinella Foreshore apart is that they kept management local, like a farmer. And they took over at the critical juncture when stock grazing was being phased out. The results are reflected in today’s vegetation. The species mix along the Corinella Foreshore walk contrasts markedly with the vegetation of the coastal reserve on the cliffs west of Inverloch, where exotic invasives are strongly represented.
The net result is that Corinella is way ahead of other coastal towns. I can only hope the advantage – and all that hard work – isn’t squandered. All vegetation requires ongoing management and informed care. Fragmentation is the enemy of biodiversity. With fragmentation my beautiful experience of that walk may become a thing of the past, never to be replicated.
Ed Thexton is president of the South Gippsland Conservation Society.